linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V11 09/22] LoongArch: Add boot and setup routines

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAAhV-H5dqNiecER3fChkBjQUGGszj6gwcpOFM1b4Kaax5vz27g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 20 May 2022 22:09:18 +0800
From:   Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...il.com>
To:     Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>
Cc:     Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
        Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...ngson.cn>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Xuefeng Li <lixuefeng@...ngson.cn>,
        Yanteng Si <siyanteng@...ngson.cn>,
        Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>, Xuerui Wang <kernel@...0n.name>,
        Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        linux-efi <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V11 09/22] LoongArch: Add boot and setup routines

Hi, Javier,

On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 5:41 PM Javier Martinez Canillas
<javierm@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> Hello Ard and Huacai,
>
> On 5/20/22 11:17, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> >> +
> >> +static int __init register_gop_device(void)
> >> +{
> >> +       void *pd;
> >> +
> >> +       if (screen_info.orig_video_isVGA != VIDEO_TYPE_EFI)
> >> +               return 0;
> >> +       pd = platform_device_register_data(NULL, "efi-framebuffer", 0,
> >> +                       &screen_info, sizeof(screen_info));
> >> +       return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(pd);
> >> +}
> >> +subsys_initcall(register_gop_device);
> >
> > Not sure this is now the correct way to do this - cc'ing Javier.
> >
>
> Is not the correct way to do it indeed, that can just be dropped.
>
> We have unified now all the system framebuffer platform device
> registration under drivers/firmware/sysfb.c (and the EFI quirks
> if needed under drivers/firmware/efi/sysfb_efi.c).
>
> So the only thing that a platform should do, is to enable the
> the CONFIG_SYSFB config option. The screen_info should be set
> correctly from the EFI GOP, but it seems that's already working
> since you were already using it in register_gop_device().
>
> But also, the "efi-framebuffer" platform device matches against
> the legacy efifb fbdev driver. And now there's a simpledrm driver
> that is also able to use the firmware-provided framebuffer.
>
> You can enable that driver with CONFIG_DRM_SIMPLEDRM.
>
> That driver though doesn't match against "efi-framebuffer" but with
> a "simple-framebuffer", to make sysfb register that instead of the
> "efi-framebuffer" device, you need to set CONFIG_SYSFB_SIMPLEFB too.
>
> If for some reasons you need to provide a fbdev interface to the
> user-space, you can enable CONFIG_DRM_FBDEV_EMULATION to have that.
>
> In summary, just enable the following to use the firmware framebuffer:
>
> CONFIG_DRM_SIMPLEDRM=y
> CONFIG_DRM_FBDEV_EMULATION=y
> CONFIG_SYSFB=y
> CONFIG_SYSFB_SIMPLEFB=y
Thank you very much, since 5.15 sysfb_init() do all things of
register_gop_device(), so register_gop_device() here can be removed.
But there is another small problem: if simpledrm or efifb driver is
built-in, there is no display. The reason is both sysfb_init() and
display driver are in the same initcall level (device_initcall()).
>From the comments I know that sysfb_init() should after PCI
enumeration which is in subsys_initcall(), so, could we make
sysfb_init() to be a subsys_initcall_sync()?

Huacai
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
> Javier Martinez Canillas
> Linux Engineering
> Red Hat
>