[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yoe7FOkZpUwwTTQW@linutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 18:00:20 +0200
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Zefan Li <lizefan.x@...edance.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>, Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 0/8] cgroup/cpuset: cpu partition code enhancements
On 2022-05-10 11:34:05 [-0400], Waiman Long wrote:
> v11:
> - Fix incorrect spacing in patch 7 and include documentation suggestions
> by Michal.
> - Move partition_is_populated() check to the last one in list of
> conditions to be checked.
If I follow this correctly, then this is the latest version of the
isolcpus= replacement with cgroup's cpusets, correct?
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists