[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bcef12c5-35b5-f6a8-24c8-d190f87c3cff@kernel.dk>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 10:06:06 -0600
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] random: convert to using iters, for Al Viro
On 5/20/22 10:03 AM, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
>> Then I'd say there are only two options:
>>
>> - Add a helper that provides splice for something that only has
>> read/write set.
>
> That'd be fine with me, but wouldn't it involve bringing back set_fs(),
> because of the copy_to_user() in there?
I haven't even looked into whether it's currently feasible or not, just
mentioning it as a potential option. But the better one is definetely
the next one...
>> - Just accept that we're 3% slower reading from /dev/urandom for now,
>> and maybe 1-2% for small reads. Can't really imagine this being a huge
>> issue, how many high throughput /dev/urandom read situations exist in
>> the real world?
>
> An option three might be that eventually the VFS overhead is worked out
> and read_iter() reaches parity. One can hope, I guess.
And that will certainly happen, especially as we have other paths that
don't really have the choice, they have to use the iterator versions.
And if we can get a bit closer, then that also opens the door more
generic conversions so we can kill ->read/->write for almost all cases
(except those weirdo ones that Al pointed out).
--
Jens Axboe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists