[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220521073523.3118246-2-yukuai3@huawei.com>
Date: Sat, 21 May 2022 15:35:18 +0800
From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
To: <jack@...e.cz>, <axboe@...nel.dk>, <paolo.valente@...aro.org>
CC: <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <yukuai3@...wei.com>,
<yi.zhang@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH -next v2 1/6] block, bfq: cleanup bfq_weights_tree add/remove apis
They already pass 'bfqd' as the first parameter, there is no need to
pass 'bfqd->queue_weights_tree' as another parameter.
Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
---
block/bfq-iosched.c | 13 +++++++------
block/bfq-iosched.h | 10 +++-------
block/bfq-wf2q.c | 16 +++++-----------
3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c
index d32b8340510a..c408c5a79d97 100644
--- a/block/bfq-iosched.c
+++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c
@@ -870,9 +870,9 @@ static bool bfq_asymmetric_scenario(struct bfq_data *bfqd,
* In most scenarios, the rate at which nodes are created/destroyed
* should be low too.
*/
-void bfq_weights_tree_add(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq,
- struct rb_root_cached *root)
+void bfq_weights_tree_add(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq)
{
+ struct rb_root_cached *root = &bfqd->queue_weights_tree;
struct bfq_entity *entity = &bfqq->entity;
struct rb_node **new = &(root->rb_root.rb_node), *parent = NULL;
bool leftmost = true;
@@ -945,12 +945,14 @@ void bfq_weights_tree_add(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq,
* about overhead.
*/
void __bfq_weights_tree_remove(struct bfq_data *bfqd,
- struct bfq_queue *bfqq,
- struct rb_root_cached *root)
+ struct bfq_queue *bfqq)
{
+ struct rb_root_cached *root;
+
if (!bfqq->weight_counter)
return;
+ root = &bfqd->queue_weights_tree;
bfqq->weight_counter->num_active--;
if (bfqq->weight_counter->num_active > 0)
goto reset_entity_pointer;
@@ -970,8 +972,7 @@ void __bfq_weights_tree_remove(struct bfq_data *bfqd,
void bfq_weights_tree_remove(struct bfq_data *bfqd,
struct bfq_queue *bfqq)
{
- __bfq_weights_tree_remove(bfqd, bfqq,
- &bfqd->queue_weights_tree);
+ __bfq_weights_tree_remove(bfqd, bfqq);
}
/*
diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.h b/block/bfq-iosched.h
index c3bd8ab169e0..0a3415abb994 100644
--- a/block/bfq-iosched.h
+++ b/block/bfq-iosched.h
@@ -932,13 +932,9 @@ struct bfq_queue *bic_to_bfqq(struct bfq_io_cq *bic, bool is_sync);
void bic_set_bfqq(struct bfq_io_cq *bic, struct bfq_queue *bfqq, bool is_sync);
struct bfq_data *bic_to_bfqd(struct bfq_io_cq *bic);
void bfq_pos_tree_add_move(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq);
-void bfq_weights_tree_add(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq,
- struct rb_root_cached *root);
-void __bfq_weights_tree_remove(struct bfq_data *bfqd,
- struct bfq_queue *bfqq,
- struct rb_root_cached *root);
-void bfq_weights_tree_remove(struct bfq_data *bfqd,
- struct bfq_queue *bfqq);
+void bfq_weights_tree_add(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq);
+void __bfq_weights_tree_remove(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq);
+void bfq_weights_tree_remove(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq);
void bfq_bfqq_expire(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq,
bool compensate, enum bfqq_expiration reason);
void bfq_put_queue(struct bfq_queue *bfqq);
diff --git a/block/bfq-wf2q.c b/block/bfq-wf2q.c
index 42464e6ff40c..ccd227fed1c3 100644
--- a/block/bfq-wf2q.c
+++ b/block/bfq-wf2q.c
@@ -727,7 +727,6 @@ __bfq_entity_update_weight_prio(struct bfq_service_tree *old_st,
struct bfq_queue *bfqq = bfq_entity_to_bfqq(entity);
unsigned int prev_weight, new_weight;
struct bfq_data *bfqd = NULL;
- struct rb_root_cached *root;
#ifdef CONFIG_BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED
struct bfq_sched_data *sd;
struct bfq_group *bfqg;
@@ -790,19 +789,15 @@ __bfq_entity_update_weight_prio(struct bfq_service_tree *old_st,
* queue, remove the entity from its old weight counter (if
* there is a counter associated with the entity).
*/
- if (prev_weight != new_weight && bfqq) {
- root = &bfqd->queue_weights_tree;
- __bfq_weights_tree_remove(bfqd, bfqq, root);
- }
+ if (prev_weight != new_weight && bfqq)
+ __bfq_weights_tree_remove(bfqd, bfqq);
entity->weight = new_weight;
/*
* Add the entity, if it is not a weight-raised queue,
* to the counter associated with its new weight.
*/
- if (prev_weight != new_weight && bfqq && bfqq->wr_coeff == 1) {
- /* If we get here, root has been initialized. */
- bfq_weights_tree_add(bfqd, bfqq, root);
- }
+ if (prev_weight != new_weight && bfqq && bfqq->wr_coeff == 1)
+ bfq_weights_tree_add(bfqd, bfqq);
new_st->wsum += entity->weight;
@@ -1695,8 +1690,7 @@ void bfq_add_bfqq_busy(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq)
if (!bfqq->dispatched)
if (bfqq->wr_coeff == 1)
- bfq_weights_tree_add(bfqd, bfqq,
- &bfqd->queue_weights_tree);
+ bfq_weights_tree_add(bfqd, bfqq);
if (bfqq->wr_coeff > 1)
bfqd->wr_busy_queues++;
--
2.31.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists