[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANAwSgT0Vmq4D9nRNc9h=xXxjmN_wXjbhwjj4btX+4SkXePkrw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 21 May 2022 15:20:51 +0530
From: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@...il.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Amit Kucheria <amitk@...nel.org>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 1/6] thermal: exynos: Enable core tmu hardware clk flag
on exynos platform
Hi Krzysztof,
On Wed, 18 May 2022 at 12:55, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On 17/05/2022 20:42, Anand Moon wrote:
> > Hi Krzysztof,
> >
> > On Sun, 15 May 2022 at 15:22, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> > <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 15/05/2022 08:41, Anand Moon wrote:
> >>> Use clk_prepare_enable api to enable tmu internal hardware clock
> >>> flag on, use clk_disable_unprepare to disable the clock.
> >>>
> >>> Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@...il.com>
> >>
> >> Here as well you ignored my first comment:
> >> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CANAwSgS=08fVsqn95WHzSF71WTTyD2-=K2C6-BEz0tY0t6A1-g@mail.gmail.com/T/#mbfc57b40a7ed043dd4d4890bedb6bad8240058cd
> >>
> >> "This is not valid reason to do a change. What is clk_summary does not
> >> really matter. Your change has negative impact on power consumption as
> >> the clock stays enabled all the time. This is not what we want... so
> >> please explain it more - why you need the clock to be enabled all the
> >> time? What is broken (clk_summary is not broken in this case)?"
> >>
This was just to update my knowledge on what is missing in the driver.
> I don't understand how all this is relevant to the Exynos TMU driver.
> You paste some COMMON_CLK framework links, but this is just a framework.
> It has nothing to do with Exynos TMU.
>
> Since we are making circles, let's make it clearer. Answer these simple
> questions:
> 1. Is Exynos TMU driver operating correctly or not correctly?
Yes Exynos TMU clk is getting initialized, but not incorrect order.
within the exynos tmu driver we call
exynos_tmu_probe
---> clk_prepare
exynos_tmu_initialize
---> clk_enable
which is seem to work but it does not enable the clk in total.
But if we call *clk_prepare_enable* in exynos_tmu_probe we enable the
clk correctly.
*Note:* This current patch is missing the clean-up in
exynos_tmu_initialize function.
>
> 2. If incorrectly, how is the incorrectness visible?
See before the change in Exynos 5422
$ sudo cat /sys/kernel/debug/clk/clk_summary | grep tmu
tmu_gpu 0 2 0 66600000
0 0 50000 N
tmu 0 6 0 66600000
0 0 50000 N
$ sudo cat /sys/kernel/debug/clk/clk_summary | grep tmu
tmu_gpu 2 2 0 66600000
0 0 50000 Y
tmu 6 6 0 66600000
0 0 50000 Y
After the changes, the internal tmu clk internal hardware flag is set to 'Y'
* hence I mention this in the commit message.*
Before the patch
# cat /sys/kernel/debug/clk/tmu/clk_enable_count
0
# cat /sys/kernel/debug/clk/tmu_gpu/clk_enable_count
0
After the patch
# cat /sys/kernel/debug/clk/tmu/clk_enable_count
6
# cat /sys/kernel/debug/clk/tmu_gpu/clk_enable_count
2
> How can we trigger and see the issue?
We can trigger or see the issue but enable clk trace feature,
for example trace clk_enable, clk_prepare clk_enable_complete
I don't know how to trace clk during clk initialization
but I will try to find out more about this.
>
> 3. If it operates correctly, maybe it is operating in nonoptimal way?
>
Few new things we could set in this TMU driver which control the internal timing
SAMPLING_INTERVAL - sample interval
COUNTER_VALUE0 - Timing control of T_EN_TEMP_SEN on/off timing
COUNTER_VALUE1 - Timing control of CLK_SENSE on/off timing
> 4. If it is not optimal, then what states are not optimal and when?
We could drop the unnecessary clk_enable and clk_disable as we don't check
the return value of the function and it just toggles the clock which
does not look optimal.
Since CLK_SENSE internally has a timer to on/off and control the PMU operations.
Look at following functions we could drop this
exynos_get_temp , exynos_tmu_control and exynos_tmu_set_emulation.
>
> In any case you commit fails to explain WHY you are doing it. I
> explained you this over the years several times and after these several
> times you still do not like to answer that simple question. This is
> pointless. You receive feedback and keep it ignored...
>
Some time is a bit hard for me to explain the feature changes in a
crisp clean way.
I will try to correct myself on this. Please try to understand this I am
just trying to improve the code.
> Always, always please explain why this change is needed.
Ok.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
Thanks & Regards
-Anand
Powered by blists - more mailing lists