linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next v5 0/3] support concurrent sync io for bfq on a specail occasion

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d5a90a08-1ac6-587a-e900-0436bd45543a@kernel.dk>
Date:   Sat, 21 May 2022 06:21:28 -0600
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:     "yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@...wei.com>, paolo.valente@...aro.org
Cc:     jack@...e.cz, tj@...nel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        yi.zhang@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v5 0/3] support concurrent sync io for bfq on a
 specail occasion

On 5/21/22 1:22 AM, yukuai (C) wrote:
> 在 2022/05/14 17:29, yukuai (C) 写道:
>> 在 2022/05/05 9:00, yukuai (C) 写道:
>>> Hi, Paolo
>>>
>>> Can you take a look at this patchset? It has been quite a long time
>>> since we spotted this problem...
>>>
>>
>> friendly ping ...
> friendly ping ...

I can't speak for Paolo, but I've mentioned before that the majority
of your messages end up in my spam. That's still the case, in fact
I just marked maybe 10 of them as not spam.

You really need to get this issued sorted out, or you will continue
to have patches ignore because folks may simply not see them.

-- 
Jens Axboe