[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+khW7gGrwTrDsfWp7wj=QaCg01FNj381a1QLs1ThsjAkW85eQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 19:34:45 -0700
From: Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>
To: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
Zefan Li <lizefan.x@...edance.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
Cgroups <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v1 3/5] bpf: Introduce cgroup iter
On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 5:59 PM Yonghong Song <yhs@...com> wrote:
> On 5/20/22 3:57 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 03:19:19PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> >> We have bpf_map iterator that walks all bpf maps.
> >> When map iterator is parametrized with map_fd the iterator walks
> >> all elements of that map.
> >> cgroup iterator should have similar semantics.
> >> When non-parameterized it will walk all cgroups and their descendent
> >> depth first way. I believe that's what Yonghong is proposing.
> >> When parametrized it will start from that particular cgroup and
> >> walk all descendant of that cgroup only.
> >> The bpf prog can stop the iteration right away with ret 1.
> >> Maybe we can add two parameters. One -> cgroup_fd to use and another ->
> >> the order of iteration css_for_each_descendant_pre vs _post.
> >> wdyt?
> >
> > Sounds perfectly reasonable to me.
>
> This works for me too. Thanks!
>
This sounds good to me. Thanks. Let's try to do it in the next iteration.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists