[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <008e29b8acd3f6c5a8c7da461c3c92fc927c10bd.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 22 May 2022 13:22:22 +0300
From: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...ux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@...ux.intel.com>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@...el.com>,
Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
intel-gvt-dev@...ts.freedesktop.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 14/19] KVM: x86: rename
.set_apic_access_page_addr to reload_apic_access_page
On Thu, 2022-05-19 at 16:55 +0000, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2022, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > This will be used on SVM to reload shadow page of the AVIC physid table
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > index d2f73ce87a1e3..ad744ab99734c 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > @@ -9949,12 +9949,12 @@ void kvm_arch_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range(struct kvm *kvm,
> > kvm_make_all_cpus_request(kvm, KVM_REQ_APIC_PAGE_RELOAD);
> > }
> >
> > -static void kvm_vcpu_reload_apic_access_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > +static void kvm_vcpu_reload_apic_pages(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > {
> > if (!lapic_in_kernel(vcpu))
> > return;
> >
> > - static_call_cond(kvm_x86_set_apic_access_page_addr)(vcpu);
> > + static_call_cond(kvm_x86_reload_apic_pages)(vcpu);
> > }
> >
> > void __kvm_request_immediate_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > @@ -10071,7 +10071,7 @@ static int vcpu_enter_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > if (kvm_check_request(KVM_REQ_LOAD_EOI_EXITMAP, vcpu))
> > vcpu_load_eoi_exitmap(vcpu);
> > if (kvm_check_request(KVM_REQ_APIC_PAGE_RELOAD, vcpu))
> > - kvm_vcpu_reload_apic_access_page(vcpu);
> > + kvm_vcpu_reload_apic_pages(vcpu);
>
> My vote is to add a new request and new kvm_x86_ops hook instead of piggybacking
> KVM_REQ_APIC_PAGE_RELOAD. The usage in kvm_arch_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range()
> very subtlies relies on the memslot and vma being allocated/controlled by KVM.
>
> The use in avic_physid_shadow_table_flush_memslot() is too similar in that it
> also deals with memslot changes, but at the same time is _very_ different in that
> it's dealing with user controlled memslots.
>
No objections, will do.
Best regards,
Maxim Levitsky
Powered by blists - more mailing lists