[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK7LNATL4nMmKgrjS8meavnpn=HisD30QxuPUKDqtWWgbGcSZw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2022 02:15:20 +0900
From: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
To: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>
Cc: Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kernelci@...ups.io" <kernelci@...ups.io>
Subject: Re: [Bug Report] - kselftest build fails if output directory is first
level sub-directory
On Sat, May 21, 2022 at 3:44 PM Muhammad Usama Anjum
<usama.anjum@...labora.com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> kselftest can be built using the kernel's top most Makefile without
> using kselftest's Makefile directly. But there is bug in the top most
> Makefile. The build fails if the specified output directory is first
> level sub-directory. Here is a example to reproduce this bug:
>
> make kselftest-all O=build
>
> "The Make is working in a wrong directory, that is why the relative path
> does not work." Masahiro Yamada. Feel free to fix it if someone pin the bug.
>
> It should be noted that the build works in some other combinations:
> make kselftest-all (works)
> make kselftest-all O=/tmp (works)
> make kselftest-all O=build/build2 (works)
>
> My unsuccessful attempt to fix this bug can be found here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220223191016.1658728-1-usama.anjum@collabora.com/
>
> Thanks,
> Muhammad Usama Anjum
This problem starts from the bad design of the kselftest framework.
I did some research before. I think I can fix the root cause but
currently I do not have enough time to do it.
KBUILD_ABS_SRCTREE is a user-interface to request
Kbuild to use the absolute path.
If it is forced in the top Makefile, users have no way to
negate it.
It is true that using the absolute path is a quick work-around
because you do not need to care about the current working directory.
If you insist on it, just go ahead. It is just two line changes.
Once the issue is fixed in a better way, your patch can be reverted easily.
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
Powered by blists - more mailing lists