[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220522194953.12097-1-nelsonapenn@protonmail.com>
Date: Sun, 22 May 2022 19:50:38 +0000
From: Nelson Penn <nelsonapenn@...tonmail.com>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Nelson Penn <nelsonapenn@...tonmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] documentation: Format button_dev as a pointer.
The docs on creating an input device driver have an example in which
button_dev is a pointer to an input_dev struct. However, in two code
snippets below, button_dev is used as if it is not a pointer. Make these
occurrences of button_dev reflect that it is a pointer.
Signed-off-by: Nelson Penn <nelsonapenn@...tonmail.com>
---
Documentation/input/input-programming.rst | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/input/input-programming.rst b/Documentation/input/input-programming.rst
index 2638dce69764..c9264814c7aa 100644
--- a/Documentation/input/input-programming.rst
+++ b/Documentation/input/input-programming.rst
@@ -85,15 +85,15 @@ accepted by this input device. Our example device can only generate EV_KEY
type events, and from those only BTN_0 event code. Thus we only set these
two bits. We could have used::
- set_bit(EV_KEY, button_dev.evbit);
- set_bit(BTN_0, button_dev.keybit);
+ set_bit(EV_KEY, button_dev->evbit);
+ set_bit(BTN_0, button_dev->keybit);
as well, but with more than single bits the first approach tends to be
shorter.
Then the example driver registers the input device structure by calling::
- input_register_device(&button_dev);
+ input_register_device(button_dev);
This adds the button_dev structure to linked lists of the input driver and
calls device handler modules _connect functions to tell them a new input
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists