linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] perf c2c: Support display for Arm64

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220522062823.GB715382@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s>
Date:   Sun, 22 May 2022 14:28:23 +0800
From:   Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
To:     James Clark <james.clark@....com>
Cc:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Like Xu <likexu@...cent.com>, Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
        Alyssa Ross <hi@...ssa.is>, Kajol Jain <kjain@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Li Huafei <lihuafei1@...wei.com>,
        German Gomez <german.gomez@....com>,
        Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
        Ali Saidi <alisaidi@...zon.com>,
        linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] perf c2c: Support display for Arm64

Hi James,

On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 03:19:09PM +0100, James Clark wrote:

[...]

> Hi Leo,
> 
> I see that the HITM and Store Refs columns (even N/A) are all 0% on Arm.
> Assuming it's a similar example to the x86 one above, does that mean that
> these are always expected to be 0? If so, should they be removed to avoid
> confusion, or is it just a case of the example not producing any non 0
> data for these columns?

On Arm SPE, we need to use 'N/A' for Store Refs, but we doesn't need
HITM.

On x86, we should expect 'N/A' is useless and should be removed.

I will update the view for this.

Thanks for the testing!

Leo