[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YomERsAM3gF7XxRZ@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Sun, 22 May 2022 01:31:02 +0100
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Chih-En Lin <shiyn.lin@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
William Kucharski <william.kucharski@...cle.com>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
Colin Cross <ccross@...gle.com>,
Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
Daniel Axtens <dja@...ens.net>,
Jonathan Marek <jonathan@...ek.ca>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>,
Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kaiyang Zhao <zhao776@...due.edu>,
Huichun Feng <foxhoundsk.tw@...il.com>,
Jim Huang <jserv.tw@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] Introduce Copy-On-Write to Page Table
On Sat, May 21, 2022 at 03:19:24PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> I can see a rather different use for this type of shared-pagetable
> technology, though: monstrous MAP_SHARED mappings. For database and some VM
> users, multiple processes will map the same file. If there was a way to
> ensure appropriate alignment (or at least encourage it) and a way to handle
> mappings that don't cover the whole file, then having multiple mappings
> share the same page tables could be a decent efficiently gain. This doesn't
> even need COW -- it's "just" pagetable sharing.
The mshare proposal did not get a warm reception at LSFMM ;-(
The conceptual model doesn't seem to work for the MM developers who were
in the room. "Fear" was the most-used word. Not sure how we're going
to get to a model of sharing page tables that doesn't scare people.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists