[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87y1ysky25.fsf@brahms.olymp>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2022 17:34:26 +0100
From: Luís Henriques <lhenriques@...e.de>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
Cc: Xiubo Li <xiubli@...hat.com>, Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>,
ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ceph: fix decoding of client session messages flags
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org> writes:
> On Mon, 2022-05-23 at 17:09 +0100, Luís Henriques wrote:
>> The cephfs kernel client started to show the message:
>>
>> ceph: mds0 session blocklisted
>>
>> when mounting a filesystem. This is due to the fact that the session
>> messages are being incorrectly decoded: the skip needs to take into
>> account the 'len'.
>>
>> While there, fixed some whitespaces too.
>>
>> Fixes: e1c9788cb397 ("ceph: don't rely on error_string to validate blocklisted session.")
>> Signed-off-by: Luís Henriques <lhenriques@...e.de>
>> ---
>> fs/ceph/mds_client.c | 14 +++++++++-----
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/ceph/mds_client.c b/fs/ceph/mds_client.c
>> index 00c3de177dd6..1bd3e1bb0fdf 100644
>> --- a/fs/ceph/mds_client.c
>> +++ b/fs/ceph/mds_client.c
>> @@ -3375,13 +3375,17 @@ static void handle_session(struct ceph_mds_session *session,
>> }
>>
>> if (msg_version >= 5) {
>> - u32 flags;
>> - /* version >= 4, struct_v, struct_cv, len, metric_spec */
>> - ceph_decode_skip_n(&p, end, 2 + sizeof(u32) * 2, bad);
>> + u32 flags, len;
>> +
>> + /* version >= 4 */
>> + ceph_decode_skip_16(&p, end, bad); /* struct_v, struct_cv */
>> + ceph_decode_32_safe(&p, end, len, bad); /* len */
>> + ceph_decode_skip_n(&p, end, len, bad); /* metric_spec */
>> +
>> /* version >= 5, flags */
>> - ceph_decode_32_safe(&p, end, flags, bad);
>> + ceph_decode_32_safe(&p, end, flags, bad);
>> if (flags & CEPH_SESSION_BLOCKLISTED) {
>> - pr_warn("mds%d session blocklisted\n", session->s_mds);
>> + pr_warn("mds%d session blocklisted\n", session->s_mds);
>> blocklisted = true;
>> }
>> }
>
> Good catch! Should we send this to stable too?
Ah, yeah. I didn't explicitly tagged it as I assumed the 'Fixes:' would
be enough for that. But it's probably better to do add the 'Cc: stable'
too.
> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
Cheers,
--
Luís
Powered by blists - more mailing lists