[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220523165806.139716938@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2022 19:04:48 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.4 21/68] mmc: core: Default to generic_cmd6_time as timeout in __mmc_switch()
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
commit 533a6cfe08f96a7b5c65e06d20916d552c11b256 upstream
All callers of __mmc_switch() should now be specifying a valid timeout for
the CMD6 command. However, just to be sure, let's print a warning and
default to use the generic_cmd6_time in case the provided timeout_ms
argument is zero.
In this context, let's also simplify some of the corresponding code and
clarify some related comments.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200122142747.5690-4-ulf.hansson@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c | 16 +++++++---------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c
@@ -460,10 +460,6 @@ static int mmc_poll_for_busy(struct mmc_
bool expired = false;
bool busy = false;
- /* We have an unspecified cmd timeout, use the fallback value. */
- if (!timeout_ms)
- timeout_ms = MMC_OPS_TIMEOUT_MS;
-
/*
* In cases when not allowed to poll by using CMD13 or because we aren't
* capable of polling by using ->card_busy(), then rely on waiting the
@@ -536,6 +532,12 @@ int __mmc_switch(struct mmc_card *card,
mmc_retune_hold(host);
+ if (!timeout_ms) {
+ pr_warn("%s: unspecified timeout for CMD6 - use generic\n",
+ mmc_hostname(host));
+ timeout_ms = card->ext_csd.generic_cmd6_time;
+ }
+
/*
* If the cmd timeout and the max_busy_timeout of the host are both
* specified, let's validate them. A failure means we need to prevent
@@ -544,7 +546,7 @@ int __mmc_switch(struct mmc_card *card,
* which also means they are on their own when it comes to deal with the
* busy timeout.
*/
- if (!(host->caps & MMC_CAP_NEED_RSP_BUSY) && timeout_ms &&
+ if (!(host->caps & MMC_CAP_NEED_RSP_BUSY) &&
host->max_busy_timeout && (timeout_ms > host->max_busy_timeout))
use_r1b_resp = false;
@@ -556,10 +558,6 @@ int __mmc_switch(struct mmc_card *card,
cmd.flags = MMC_CMD_AC;
if (use_r1b_resp) {
cmd.flags |= MMC_RSP_SPI_R1B | MMC_RSP_R1B;
- /*
- * A busy_timeout of zero means the host can decide to use
- * whatever value it finds suitable.
- */
cmd.busy_timeout = timeout_ms;
} else {
cmd.flags |= MMC_RSP_SPI_R1 | MMC_RSP_R1;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists