[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220523165837.275680903@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2022 19:03:18 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@...il.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.17 041/158] drbd: remove usage of list iterator variable after loop
From: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@...il.com>
[ Upstream commit 901aeda62efa21f2eae937bccb71b49ae531be06 ]
In preparation to limit the scope of a list iterator to the list
traversal loop, use a dedicated pointer to iterate through the list [1].
Since that variable should not be used past the loop iteration, a
separate variable is used to 'remember the current location within the
loop'.
To either continue iterating from that position or skip the iteration
(if the previous iteration was complete) list_prepare_entry() is used.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHk-=wgRr_D8CB-D9Kg-c=EHreAsk5SqXPwr9Y7k9sA6cWXJ6w@mail.gmail.com/ [1]
Signed-off-by: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@...il.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220331220349.885126-1-jakobkoschel@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
drivers/block/drbd/drbd_main.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_main.c b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_main.c
index 478ba959362c..416f4f48f69b 100644
--- a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_main.c
+++ b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_main.c
@@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ void tl_release(struct drbd_connection *connection, unsigned int barrier_nr,
unsigned int set_size)
{
struct drbd_request *r;
- struct drbd_request *req = NULL;
+ struct drbd_request *req = NULL, *tmp = NULL;
int expect_epoch = 0;
int expect_size = 0;
@@ -225,8 +225,11 @@ void tl_release(struct drbd_connection *connection, unsigned int barrier_nr,
* to catch requests being barrier-acked "unexpectedly".
* It usually should find the same req again, or some READ preceding it. */
list_for_each_entry(req, &connection->transfer_log, tl_requests)
- if (req->epoch == expect_epoch)
+ if (req->epoch == expect_epoch) {
+ tmp = req;
break;
+ }
+ req = list_prepare_entry(tmp, &connection->transfer_log, tl_requests);
list_for_each_entry_safe_from(req, r, &connection->transfer_log, tl_requests) {
if (req->epoch != expect_epoch)
break;
--
2.35.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists