lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220523171559.472112-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Date:   Mon, 23 May 2022 18:15:59 +0100
From:   Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>
To:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>, Liang Chen <cl@...k-chips.com>,
        Kever Yang <kever.yang@...k-chips.com>,
        Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@...k-chips.com>,
        Peter Geis <pgwipeout@...il.com>,
        Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>,
        Nicolas Frattaroli <frattaroli.nicolas@...il.com>,
        Etienne Carriere <etienne.carriere@...aro.org>,
        Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Subject: [PATCH] firmware: arm_scmi: Relax BASE protocol sanity checks on protocol list

Even though malformed replies from firmware must be treated carefully to
avoid memory corruption Kernel side, some out-of-spec SCMI replies can
be tolerated to avoid breaking existing deployed system, as long as they
won't cause memory issues.

Reported-by: Nicolas Frattaroli <frattaroli.nicolas@...il.com>
Cc: Etienne Carriere <etienne.carriere@...aro.org>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>
---
 drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/base.c | 16 +++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/base.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/base.c
index 20fba7370f4e..d0ac96da1ddf 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/base.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/base.c
@@ -221,11 +221,17 @@ scmi_base_implementation_list_get(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph,
 		calc_list_sz = (1 + (loop_num_ret - 1) / sizeof(u32)) *
 				sizeof(u32);
 		if (calc_list_sz != real_list_sz) {
-			dev_err(dev,
-				"Malformed reply - real_sz:%zd  calc_sz:%u\n",
-				real_list_sz, calc_list_sz);
-			ret = -EPROTO;
-			break;
+			dev_warn(dev,
+				 "Malformed reply - real_sz:%zd  calc_sz:%u  (loop_num_ret:%d)\n",
+				 real_list_sz, calc_list_sz, loop_num_ret);
+			/*
+			 * Bail out if the expected list size is bigger than the
+			 * total payload size of the received reply.
+			 */
+			if (calc_list_sz > real_list_sz) {
+				ret = -EPROTO;
+				break;
+			}
 		}
 
 		for (loop = 0; loop < loop_num_ret; loop++)
-- 
2.36.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ