linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.17 091/158] net: lan966x: Fix assignment of the MAC address

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 23 May 2022 19:04:08 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.17 091/158] net: lan966x: Fix assignment of the MAC address

From: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>

[ Upstream commit af8ca6eaa9b24a90484218e356f959a94bff22fa ]

The following two scenarios were failing for lan966x.
1. If the port had the address X and then trying to assign the same
   address, then the HW was just removing this address because first it
   tries to learn new address and then delete the old one. As they are
   the same the HW remove it.
2. If the port eth0 was assigned the same address as one of the other
   ports eth1 then when assigning back the address to eth0 then the HW
   was deleting the address of eth1.

The case 1. is fixed by checking if the port has already the same
address while case 2. is fixed by checking if the address is used by any
other port.

Fixes: e18aba8941b40b ("net: lan966x: add mactable support")
Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220513180030.3076793-1-horatiu.vultur@microchip.com
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 .../ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.c
index 1f60fd125a1d..fee148bbf13e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.c
@@ -100,6 +100,24 @@ static int lan966x_create_targets(struct platform_device *pdev,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static bool lan966x_port_unique_address(struct net_device *dev)
+{
+	struct lan966x_port *port = netdev_priv(dev);
+	struct lan966x *lan966x = port->lan966x;
+	int p;
+
+	for (p = 0; p < lan966x->num_phys_ports; ++p) {
+		port = lan966x->ports[p];
+		if (!port || port->dev == dev)
+			continue;
+
+		if (ether_addr_equal(dev->dev_addr, port->dev->dev_addr))
+			return false;
+	}
+
+	return true;
+}
+
 static int lan966x_port_set_mac_address(struct net_device *dev, void *p)
 {
 	struct lan966x_port *port = netdev_priv(dev);
@@ -107,16 +125,26 @@ static int lan966x_port_set_mac_address(struct net_device *dev, void *p)
 	const struct sockaddr *addr = p;
 	int ret;
 
+	if (ether_addr_equal(addr->sa_data, dev->dev_addr))
+		return 0;
+
 	/* Learn the new net device MAC address in the mac table. */
 	ret = lan966x_mac_cpu_learn(lan966x, addr->sa_data, HOST_PVID);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
+	/* If there is another port with the same address as the dev, then don't
+	 * delete it from the MAC table
+	 */
+	if (!lan966x_port_unique_address(dev))
+		goto out;
+
 	/* Then forget the previous one. */
 	ret = lan966x_mac_cpu_forget(lan966x, dev->dev_addr, HOST_PVID);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
+out:
 	eth_hw_addr_set(dev, addr->sa_data);
 	return ret;
 }
-- 
2.35.1