lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220523165851.110975996@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 23 May 2022 19:04:40 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>,
        Daejun Park <daejun7.park@...sung.com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.17 123/158] scsi: ufs: core: Fix referencing invalid rsp field

From: Daejun Park <daejun7.park@...sung.com>

[ Upstream commit d5d92b64408443e113b9742f8f1c35278910dd4d ]

Fix referencing sense data when it is invalid. When the length of the data
segment is 0, there is no valid information in the rsp field, so
ufshpb_rsp_upiu() is returned without additional operation.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/252651381.41652940482659.JavaMail.epsvc@epcpadp4
Fixes: 4b5f49079c52 ("scsi: ufs: ufshpb: L2P map management for HPB read")
Acked-by: Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>
Signed-off-by: Daejun Park <daejun7.park@...sung.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c | 19 +++++++------------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c
index b34feba1f53d..8dc818b03939 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c
@@ -1256,6 +1256,13 @@ void ufshpb_rsp_upiu(struct ufs_hba *hba, struct ufshcd_lrb *lrbp)
 	struct utp_hpb_rsp *rsp_field = &lrbp->ucd_rsp_ptr->hr;
 	int data_seg_len;
 
+	data_seg_len = be32_to_cpu(lrbp->ucd_rsp_ptr->header.dword_2)
+		& MASK_RSP_UPIU_DATA_SEG_LEN;
+
+	/* If data segment length is zero, rsp_field is not valid */
+	if (!data_seg_len)
+		return;
+
 	if (unlikely(lrbp->lun != rsp_field->lun)) {
 		struct scsi_device *sdev;
 		bool found = false;
@@ -1290,18 +1297,6 @@ void ufshpb_rsp_upiu(struct ufs_hba *hba, struct ufshcd_lrb *lrbp)
 		return;
 	}
 
-	data_seg_len = be32_to_cpu(lrbp->ucd_rsp_ptr->header.dword_2)
-		& MASK_RSP_UPIU_DATA_SEG_LEN;
-
-	/* To flush remained rsp_list, we queue the map_work task */
-	if (!data_seg_len) {
-		if (!ufshpb_is_general_lun(hpb->lun))
-			return;
-
-		ufshpb_kick_map_work(hpb);
-		return;
-	}
-
 	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct utp_hpb_rsp) != UTP_HPB_RSP_SIZE);
 
 	if (!ufshpb_is_hpb_rsp_valid(hba, lrbp, rsp_field))
-- 
2.35.1



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ