lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 23 May 2022 12:14:02 -0600
From:   Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>,
        Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>,
        Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 04/25] kunit: take `kunit_assert` as `const`

On 5/23/22 11:15 AM, Daniel Latypov wrote:
> On Sun, May 22, 2022 at 7:03 PM Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
>> The `kunit_do_failed_assertion` function passes its
>> `struct kunit_assert` argument to `kunit_fail`. This one,
>> in turn, calls its `format` field passing the assert again
>> as a `const` pointer.
>>
>> Therefore, the whole chain may be made `const`.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>
>> ---
>> This is a prerequisite patch, independently submitted at:
>>
>>      https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220502093625.GA23225@kernel.org/
> 
> FYI, we'd asked Shuah to pick this patch up in her "kunit" branch.
> It's applied here:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest.git/commit/?h=kunit&id=7466886b400b1904ce30fa311904849e314a2cf4
> 
> It had previously seemed unclear if this series could make it for the
> 5.19 merge window (but it now looks like there's interest in trying it
> out early on).
> 
> Daniel
> 

I am just about send pull request with this patch included.

thanks,
-- Shuah

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ