[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YovkR56ZYsPhDW4q@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2022 22:45:11 +0300
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
To: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 01/25] kallsyms: avoid hardcoding the buffer size
On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 04:01:14AM +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
>
> This makes it easier to update the size later on.
>
This does not really conform to [1].
E.g.
"Declare KSY_NAME_LEN, which describes the maximum length for a kernel
symbol read by kallsyms from the input. In read_symbol(), define the
buffer to be of length "KSY_NAME_LEN + 1", which includes the terminator
character."
would be better.
> Furthermore, a static assert is added to ensure both are updated
> when that happens. The relationship used is one that keeps the new
> size (512+1) close to the original buffer size (500).
You must split this then into two patches:
1. A patch that re-defines the length with KSYM_NAME_LEN, i.e.
#define KSYM_NAME_LEN 499
2. A patch which increases the size and reasoning for that.
Right now bundles two separate changes, which does not conform to [2].
BR, Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists