linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] leds: Add driver for Qualcomm LPG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220523220107.6wmpp2ohw63p4mjh@SoMainline.org>
Date:   Tue, 24 May 2022 00:01:07 +0200
From:   Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>
To:     Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ys.net>,
        Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] leds: Add driver for Qualcomm LPG

On 2022-05-23 18:30:38, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> > The Light Pulse Generator (LPG) is a PWM-block found in a wide range of
> > PMICs from Qualcomm. It can operate on fixed parameters or based on a
> > lookup-table, altering the duty cycle over time - which provides the
> > means for e.g. hardware assisted transitions of LED brightness.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
> 
> I'd really like to see the patch fixing the pattern interface (or
> disabling it). I don't want to push the tree to Linus with that bug.

(I couldn't help but be confused for a minute by this being a reply to
the original v1 patchset from March 2017 :) )

Does that mean there's still some time to review / pick up [1]
(LPG enablement for PM660L)?  And even more so for [2] (fixing the use
of a software-pattern variable in the hardware-pattern code) which
complements Bjorn's series but hasn't been looked at ever since last
year.

I wouldn't mind picking up this issue (discussed in the v14 series at
[3]) and unblock you sending the tree to Linus without reverting, if
Bjorn doesn't have the bandwidth for it currently.  But I will need
confirmation that patches sent in my name actually get looked at...
Thanks!

- Marijn

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-leds/20220511190718.764445-1-marijn.suijten@somainline.org/
[2]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-leds/20210915080252.69147-1-marijn.suijten@somainline.org/
[3]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-leds/YnvhleAI5RW0ZvkV@ripper/T/#m6cb0d8df051bbcd3772d068640ccd784678ad47b