| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 23 May 2022 15:47:32 -0700
From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
To: Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@...aro.org>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
linux- stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
syzbot+f264bffdfbd5614f3bb2@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] bpf: Fix KASAN use-after-free Read in compute_effective_progs
On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 2:36 PM Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On 5/17/22 11:04, Tadeusz Struk wrote:
> > Syzbot found a Use After Free bug in compute_effective_progs().
> > The reproducer creates a number of BPF links, and causes a fault
> > injected alloc to fail, while calling bpf_link_detach on them.
> > Link detach triggers the link to be freed by bpf_link_free(),
> > which calls __cgroup_bpf_detach() and update_effective_progs().
> > If the memory allocation in this function fails, the function restores
> > the pointer to the bpf_cgroup_link on the cgroup list, but the memory
> > gets freed just after it returns. After this, every subsequent call to
> > update_effective_progs() causes this already deallocated pointer to be
> > dereferenced in prog_list_length(), and triggers KASAN UAF error.
> >
> > To fix this issue don't preserve the pointer to the prog or link in the
> > list, but remove it and replace it with a dummy prog without shrinking
> > the table. The subsequent call to __cgroup_bpf_detach() or
> > __cgroup_bpf_detach() will correct it.
> >
> > Cc: "Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@...nel.org>
> > Cc: "Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@...earbox.net>
> > Cc: "Andrii Nakryiko" <andrii@...nel.org>
> > Cc: "Martin KaFai Lau" <kafai@...com>
> > Cc: "Song Liu" <songliubraving@...com>
> > Cc: "Yonghong Song" <yhs@...com>
> > Cc: "John Fastabend" <john.fastabend@...il.com>
> > Cc: "KP Singh" <kpsingh@...nel.org>
> > Cc: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
> > Cc: <bpf@...r.kernel.org>
> > Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
> > Cc: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
> >
> > Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=8ebf179a95c2a2670f7cf1ba62429ec044369db4
> > Fixes: af6eea57437a ("bpf: Implement bpf_link-based cgroup BPF program attachment")
> > Reported-by: <syzbot+f264bffdfbd5614f3bb2@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@...aro.org>
> > ---
> > v2: Add a fall back path that removes a prog from the effective progs
> > table in case detach fails to allocate memory in compute_effective_progs().
> >
> > v3: Implement the fallback in a separate function purge_effective_progs
> >
> > v4: Changed purge_effective_progs() to manipulate the array in a similar way
> > how replace_effective_prog() does it.
> > ---
> > kernel/bpf/cgroup.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> > 1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c b/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
> > index 128028efda64..6f1a6160c99e 100644
> > --- a/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
> > +++ b/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
> > @@ -681,6 +681,60 @@ static struct bpf_prog_list *find_detach_entry(struct list_head *progs,
> > return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
> > }
> >
> > +/**
> > + * purge_effective_progs() - After compute_effective_progs fails to alloc new
> > + * cgrp->bpf.inactive table we can recover by
> > + * recomputing the array in place.
> > + *
> > + * @cgrp: The cgroup which descendants to travers
> > + * @prog: A program to detach or NULL
> > + * @link: A link to detach or NULL
> > + * @atype: Type of detach operation
> > + */
> > +static void purge_effective_progs(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct bpf_prog *prog,
> > + struct bpf_cgroup_link *link,
> > + enum cgroup_bpf_attach_type atype)
> > +{
> > + struct cgroup_subsys_state *css;
> > + struct bpf_prog_array *progs;
> > + struct bpf_prog_list *pl;
> > + struct list_head *head;
> > + struct cgroup *cg;
> > + int pos;
> > +
> > + /* recompute effective prog array in place */
> > + css_for_each_descendant_pre(css, &cgrp->self) {
> > + struct cgroup *desc = container_of(css, struct cgroup, self);
> > +
> > + if (percpu_ref_is_zero(&desc->bpf.refcnt))
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + /* find position of link or prog in effective progs array */
> > + for (pos = 0, cg = desc; cg; cg = cgroup_parent(cg)) {
> > + if (pos && !(cg->bpf.flags[atype] & BPF_F_ALLOW_MULTI))
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + head = &cg->bpf.progs[atype];
> > + list_for_each_entry(pl, head, node) {
> > + if (!prog_list_prog(pl))
> > + continue;
> > + if (pl->prog == prog && pl->link == link)
> > + goto found;
> > + pos++;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +found:
> > + BUG_ON(!cg);
> > + progs = rcu_dereference_protected(
> > + desc->bpf.effective[atype],
> > + lockdep_is_held(&cgroup_mutex));
> > +
> > + /* Remove the program from the array */
> > + WARN_ONCE(bpf_prog_array_delete_safe_at(progs, pos),
> > + "Failed to purge a prog from array at index %d", pos);
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > /**
> > * __cgroup_bpf_detach() - Detach the program or link from a cgroup, and
> > * propagate the change to descendants
> > @@ -723,8 +777,12 @@ static int __cgroup_bpf_detach(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct bpf_prog *prog,
> > pl->link = NULL;
> >
> > err = update_effective_progs(cgrp, atype);
> > - if (err)
> > - goto cleanup;
> > + if (err) {
> > + /* If update affective array failed replace the prog with a dummy prog*/
> > + pl->prog = old_prog;
> > + pl->link = link;
> > + purge_effective_progs(cgrp, old_prog, link, atype);
> > + }
> >
> > /* now can actually delete it from this cgroup list */
> > list_del(&pl->node);
> > @@ -736,12 +794,6 @@ static int __cgroup_bpf_detach(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct bpf_prog *prog,
> > bpf_prog_put(old_prog);
> > static_branch_dec(&cgroup_bpf_enabled_key[atype]);
> > return 0;
> > -
> > -cleanup:
> > - /* restore back prog or link */
> > - pl->prog = old_prog;
> > - pl->link = link;
> > - return err;
> > }
> >
> > static int cgroup_bpf_detach(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct bpf_prog *prog,
>
> Hi Andrii,
> Do you have any more feedback? Does it look better to you now?
Hi, this is on my TODO list, but I need a bit more focused time to
think all this through and I haven't managed to get it in last week.
I'm worried about the percpu_ref_is_zero(&desc->bpf.refcnt) portion
and whether it can cause some skew in the calculated array index, I
need to look at this a bit more in depth. Sorry for the delay.
> --
> Thanks,
> Tadeusz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists