[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <460693.1653286129@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2022 07:08:49 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>, Xiubo Li <xiubli@...hat.com>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, Steve French <sfrench@...ba.org>,
Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>,
David Wysochanski <dwysocha@...hat.com>,
Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>,
v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net, ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org, linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-cachefs@...hat.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] netfs: ->cleanup() op is always given a rreq pointer now
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org> wrote:
> Do we need free_subrequest? It looks like nothing defines it in this
> series.
These two patches add stuff that's used by stuff on my netfs-lib branch, but
that's not going to be pushed this window, so I won't push these two patches
for now.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists