linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] netfs: ->cleanup() op is always given a rreq pointer now

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 23 May 2022 07:08:49 +0100
From:   David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:     Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>, Xiubo Li <xiubli@...hat.com>
Cc:     dhowells@...hat.com, Steve French <sfrench@...ba.org>,
        Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>,
        David Wysochanski <dwysocha@...hat.com>,
        Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>,
        v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net, ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org, linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-cachefs@...hat.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] netfs: ->cleanup() op is always given a rreq pointer now

Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org> wrote:

> Do we need free_subrequest? It looks like nothing defines it in this
> series.

These two patches add stuff that's used by stuff on my netfs-lib branch, but
that's not going to be pushed this window, so I won't push these two patches
for now.

David