lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f1a9c46e-59a6-7b68-fd17-6f2563e24e98@suse.de>
Date:   Mon, 23 May 2022 14:05:08 +0800
From:   Coly Li <colyli@...e.de>
To:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the block tree

On 5/23/22 10:52 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 5/22/22 8:49 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> After merging the block tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
>> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>>
>> drivers/md/bcache/btree.c: In function 'bch_btree_check':
>> drivers/md/bcache/btree.c:2073:1: error: the frame size of 2184 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=]
>>   2073 | }
>>        | ^
>>
>> Caused by commit
>>
>>    c766acd3d78e ("bcache: improve multithreaded bch_btree_check()")
>>
>> struct btree_check_state is very large to put on the stack :-(
>>
>> I have reverted that commit for today.

Hi Jens,

> Thanks, I'll drop it. It's not part of the initial request sent to
> Linus, exactly because it arrived late.
>
> Coly, I'm dropping this series.

Yes please. Should I re-submit the fixed series to you in later -RC 
round, or wait for 5.20 merge window?


Thanks.

Coly Li



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ