lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 23 May 2022 09:15:26 +0200
From:   Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@...ia.com>
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: core: Workaround false-positive LOCKDEP in
 delete_device

Hello Wolfram,

On 21/05/2022 11:50, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>> +			/*
>> +			 * We drop the mutex here, because device unregister
>> +			 * will take sysfs lock (kn->count) which, as LOCKDEP
>> +			 * would think, depends on this mutex
>> +			 */
> I have to ask: can't lockdep be fixed or the lock somehow be annotated
> to prevent the false positive?

I would be happy to test any other proposal, I personally didn't find other working
approach until now. This particular patch actually has an advantage of reducing the
locked region, which makes sense if only userspace_clients is protected by the mutex.

-- 
Best regards,
Alexander Sverdlin.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ