[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220523073732.296247-1-imagedong@tencent.com>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2022 15:37:32 +0800
From: menglong8.dong@...il.com
To: ast@...nel.org
Cc: daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org, kafai@...com,
songliubraving@...com, yhs@...com, john.fastabend@...il.com,
kpsingh@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Menglong Dong <imagedong@...cent.com>,
Jiang Biao <benbjiang@...cent.com>,
Hao Peng <flyingpeng@...cent.com>
Subject: [PATCH] bpf: fix probe read error in ___bpf_prog_run()
From: Menglong Dong <imagedong@...cent.com>
I think there is something wrong with BPF_PROBE_MEM in ___bpf_prog_run()
in big-endian machine. Let's make a test and see what will happen if we
want to load a 'u16' with BPF_PROBE_MEM.
Let's make the src value '0x0001', the value of dest register will become
0x0001000000000000, as the value will be loaded to the first 2 byte of
DST with following code:
bpf_probe_read_kernel(&DST, SIZE, (const void *)(long) (SRC + insn->off));
Obviously, the value in DST is not correct. In fact, we can compare
BPF_PROBE_MEM with LDX_MEM_H:
DST = *(SIZE *)(unsigned long) (SRC + insn->off);
If the memory load is done by LDX_MEM_H, the value in DST will be 0x1 now.
And I think this error results in the test case 'test_bpf_sk_storage_map'
failing:
test_bpf_sk_storage_map:PASS:bpf_iter_bpf_sk_storage_map__open_and_load 0 nsec
test_bpf_sk_storage_map:PASS:socket 0 nsec
test_bpf_sk_storage_map:PASS:map_update 0 nsec
test_bpf_sk_storage_map:PASS:socket 0 nsec
test_bpf_sk_storage_map:PASS:map_update 0 nsec
test_bpf_sk_storage_map:PASS:socket 0 nsec
test_bpf_sk_storage_map:PASS:map_update 0 nsec
test_bpf_sk_storage_map:PASS:attach_iter 0 nsec
test_bpf_sk_storage_map:PASS:create_iter 0 nsec
test_bpf_sk_storage_map:PASS:read 0 nsec
test_bpf_sk_storage_map:FAIL:ipv6_sk_count got 0 expected 3
$10/26 bpf_iter/bpf_sk_storage_map:FAIL
The code of the test case is simply, it will load sk->sk_family to the
register with BPF_PROBE_MEM and check if it is AF_INET6. With this patch,
now the test case 'bpf_iter' can pass:
$10 bpf_iter:OK
Reviewed-by: Jiang Biao <benbjiang@...cent.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao Peng <flyingpeng@...cent.com>
Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <imagedong@...cent.com>
---
kernel/bpf/core.c | 11 ++++++-----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c
index 13e9dbeeedf3..09e3f374739a 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/core.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c
@@ -1945,14 +1945,15 @@ static u64 ___bpf_prog_run(u64 *regs, const struct bpf_insn *insn)
LDST(W, u32)
LDST(DW, u64)
#undef LDST
-#define LDX_PROBE(SIZEOP, SIZE) \
+#define LDX_PROBE(SIZEOP, SIZE, TYPE) \
LDX_PROBE_MEM_##SIZEOP: \
bpf_probe_read_kernel(&DST, SIZE, (const void *)(long) (SRC + insn->off)); \
+ DST = *((TYPE *)&DST); \
CONT;
- LDX_PROBE(B, 1)
- LDX_PROBE(H, 2)
- LDX_PROBE(W, 4)
- LDX_PROBE(DW, 8)
+ LDX_PROBE(B, 1, u8)
+ LDX_PROBE(H, 2, u16)
+ LDX_PROBE(W, 4, u32)
+ LDX_PROBE(DW, 8, u64)
#undef LDX_PROBE
#define ATOMIC_ALU_OP(BOP, KOP) \
--
2.36.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists