lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BL1PR11MB5271E995E160E0C6A6C0C89A8CD49@BL1PR11MB5271.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Mon, 23 May 2022 08:25:33 +0000
From:   "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>
To:     Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>,
        "iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "dmaengine@...r.kernel.org" <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
        Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.com>,
        "Lu Baolu" <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        "vkoul@...nel.org" <vkoul@...nel.org>,
        "robin.murphy@....com" <robin.murphy@....com>,
        "will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>
CC:     "Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
        "Jiang, Dave" <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
        "Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
        Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 4/6] iommu: Add PASID support for DMA mapping API users

> From: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
> Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2022 2:21 AM
> 
> DMA mapping API is the de facto standard for in-kernel DMA. It operates
> on a per device/RID basis which is not PASID-aware.
> 
> Some modern devices such as Intel Data Streaming Accelerator, PASID is
> required for certain work submissions. To allow such devices use DMA
> mapping API, we need the following functionalities:
> 1. Provide device a way to retrieve a PASID for work submission within
> the kernel
> 2. Enable the kernel PASID on the IOMMU for the device
> 3. Attach the kernel PASID to the device's default DMA domain, let it
> be IOVA or physical address in case of pass-through.
> 
> This patch introduces a driver facing API that enables DMA API
> PASID usage. Once enabled, device drivers can continue to use DMA APIs as
> is. There is no difference in dma_handle between without PASID and with
> PASID.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c | 114
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/dma-iommu.h |   3 +
>  2 files changed, 117 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
> index 1ca85d37eeab..6ad7ba619ef0 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
> @@ -34,6 +34,8 @@ struct iommu_dma_msi_page {
>  	phys_addr_t		phys;
>  };
> 
> +static DECLARE_IOASID_SET(iommu_dma_pasid);
> +
>  enum iommu_dma_cookie_type {
>  	IOMMU_DMA_IOVA_COOKIE,
>  	IOMMU_DMA_MSI_COOKIE,
> @@ -370,6 +372,118 @@ void iommu_put_dma_cookie(struct
> iommu_domain *domain)
>  	domain->iova_cookie = NULL;
>  }
> 
> +/* Protect iommu_domain DMA PASID data */
> +static DEFINE_MUTEX(dma_pasid_lock);
> +/**
> + * iommu_attach_dma_pasid --Attach a PASID for in-kernel DMA. Use the
> device's
> + * DMA domain.
> + * @dev: Device to be enabled
> + * @pasid: The returned kernel PASID to be used for DMA
> + *
> + * DMA request with PASID will be mapped the same way as the legacy DMA.
> + * If the device is in pass-through, PASID will also pass-through. If the
> + * device is in IOVA, the PASID will point to the same IOVA page table.
> + *
> + * @return err code or 0 on success
> + */
> +int iommu_attach_dma_pasid(struct device *dev, ioasid_t *pasid)

iommu_attach_dma_domain_pasid? 'dma_pasid' is too broad from
a API p.o.v.

> +{
> +	struct iommu_domain *dom;
> +	ioasid_t id, max;
> +	int ret = 0;
> +
> +	dom = iommu_get_domain_for_dev(dev);
> +	if (!dom || !dom->ops || !dom->ops->attach_dev_pasid)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	/* Only support domain types that DMA API can be used */
> +	if (dom->type == IOMMU_DOMAIN_UNMANAGED ||
> +	    dom->type == IOMMU_DOMAIN_BLOCKED) {
> +		dev_warn(dev, "Invalid domain type %d", dom->type);
> +		return -EPERM;
> +	}

WARN_ON.

and probably we can just check whether domain is default domain here.

> +
> +	mutex_lock(&dma_pasid_lock);
> +	id = dom->dma_pasid;
> +	if (!id) {
> +		/*
> +		 * First device to use PASID in its DMA domain, allocate
> +		 * a single PASID per DMA domain is all we need, it is also
> +		 * good for performance when it comes down to IOTLB flush.
> +		 */
> +		max = 1U << dev->iommu->pasid_bits;
> +		if (!max) {
> +			ret = -EINVAL;
> +			goto done_unlock;
> +		}
> +
> +		id = ioasid_alloc(&iommu_dma_pasid, 1, max, dev);
> +		if (id == INVALID_IOASID) {
> +			ret = -ENOMEM;
> +			goto done_unlock;
> +		}
> +
> +		dom->dma_pasid = id;
> +		atomic_set(&dom->dma_pasid_users, 1);

this is always accessed with lock held hence no need to be atomic.

> +	}
> +
> +	ret = iommu_attach_device_pasid(dom, dev, id);
> +	if (!ret) {
> +		*pasid = id;
> +		atomic_inc(&dom->dma_pasid_users);
> +		goto done_unlock;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&dom->dma_pasid_users)) {
> +		ioasid_free(id);
> +		dom->dma_pasid = 0;
> +	}
> +done_unlock:
> +	mutex_unlock(&dma_pasid_lock);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(iommu_attach_dma_pasid);
> +
> +/**
> + * iommu_detach_dma_pasid --Disable in-kernel DMA request with PASID
> + * @dev:	Device's PASID DMA to be disabled
> + *
> + * It is the device driver's responsibility to ensure no more incoming DMA
> + * requests with the kernel PASID before calling this function. IOMMU driver
> + * ensures PASID cache, IOTLBs related to the kernel PASID are cleared and
> + * drained.
> + *
> + */
> +void iommu_detach_dma_pasid(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct iommu_domain *dom;
> +	ioasid_t pasid;
> +
> +	dom = iommu_get_domain_for_dev(dev);
> +	if (WARN_ON(!dom || !dom->ops || !dom->ops->detach_dev_pasid))
> +		return;
> +
> +	/* Only support DMA API managed domain type */
> +	if (WARN_ON(dom->type == IOMMU_DOMAIN_UNMANAGED ||
> +		    dom->type == IOMMU_DOMAIN_BLOCKED))
> +		return;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&dma_pasid_lock);
> +	pasid = iommu_get_pasid_from_domain(dev, dom);
> +	if (!pasid || pasid == INVALID_IOASID) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "No valid DMA PASID attached\n");
> +		mutex_unlock(&dma_pasid_lock);
> +		return;
> +	}

here just use dom->dma_pasid and let iommu driver to figure out
underlying whether this device has been attached to the domain
with the said pasid.

> +	iommu_detach_device_pasid(dom, dev, pasid);
> +	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&dom->dma_pasid_users)) {
> +		ioasid_free(pasid);
> +		dom->dma_pasid = 0;
> +	}
> +	mutex_unlock(&dma_pasid_lock);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(iommu_detach_dma_pasid);
> +
>  /**
>   * iommu_dma_get_resv_regions - Reserved region driver helper
>   * @dev: Device from iommu_get_resv_regions()
> diff --git a/include/linux/dma-iommu.h b/include/linux/dma-iommu.h
> index 24607dc3c2ac..538650b9cb75 100644
> --- a/include/linux/dma-iommu.h
> +++ b/include/linux/dma-iommu.h
> @@ -18,6 +18,9 @@ int iommu_get_dma_cookie(struct iommu_domain
> *domain);
>  int iommu_get_msi_cookie(struct iommu_domain *domain, dma_addr_t
> base);
>  void iommu_put_dma_cookie(struct iommu_domain *domain);
> 
> +int iommu_attach_dma_pasid(struct device *dev, ioasid_t *pasid);
> +void iommu_detach_dma_pasid(struct device *dev);
> +
>  /* Setup call for arch DMA mapping code */
>  void iommu_setup_dma_ops(struct device *dev, u64 dma_base, u64
> dma_limit);
>  int iommu_dma_init_fq(struct iommu_domain *domain);
> --
> 2.25.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ