linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next v5 0/3] support concurrent sync io for bfq on a specail occasion

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 23 May 2022 06:36:58 -0600
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:     Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, "yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@...wei.com>
Cc:     paolo.valente@...aro.org, tj@...nel.org,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, yi.zhang@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v5 0/3] support concurrent sync io for bfq on a
 specail occasion

On 5/23/22 2:59 AM, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Mon 23-05-22 09:10:38, yukuai (C) wrote:
>> ? 2022/05/21 20:21, Jens Axboe ??:
>>> On 5/21/22 1:22 AM, yukuai (C) wrote:
>>>> ? 2022/05/14 17:29, yukuai (C) ??:
>>>>> ? 2022/05/05 9:00, yukuai (C) ??:
>>>>>> Hi, Paolo
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can you take a look at this patchset? It has been quite a long time
>>>>>> since we spotted this problem...
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> friendly ping ...
>>>> friendly ping ...
>>>
>>> I can't speak for Paolo, but I've mentioned before that the majority
>>> of your messages end up in my spam. That's still the case, in fact
>>> I just marked maybe 10 of them as not spam.
>>>
>>> You really need to get this issued sorted out, or you will continue
>>> to have patches ignore because folks may simply not see them.
>>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thanks for your notice.
>>
>> Is it just me or do you see someone else's messages from *huawei.com
>> end up in spam? I tried to seek help from our IT support, however, they
>> didn't find anything unusual...
> 
> So actually I have noticed that a lot of (valid) email from huawei.com (not
> just you) ends up in the spam mailbox. For me direct messages usually pass
> (likely matching SPF records for originating mail server save the email
> from going to spam) but messages going through mailing lists are flagged as
> spam because the emails are missing valid DKIM signature but huawei.com
> DMARC config says there should be DKIM signature (even direct messages are
> missing DKIM so this does not seem as a mailing list configuration issue).
> So this seems as some misconfiguration of the mails on huawei.com side
> (likely missing DKIM signing of outgoing email).

SPF/DKIM was indeed a problem earlier for yukaui patches, but I don't
see that anymore. Maybe it's still an issue for some emails, from them
or Huawei in general?

-- 
Jens Axboe