lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 23 May 2022 07:53:57 -0500
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc:     Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
        Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
        Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: Convert CoreSight bindings to DT
 schema

On Sat, May 21, 2022 at 04:54:48PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 20/05/2022 23:44, Rob Herring wrote:
> > Each CoreSight component has slightly different requirements and
> > nothing applies to every component, so each CoreSight component has its
> > own schema document.
> > 
> 
> (...)
> 
> > +        const: arm,coresight-dynamic-funnel
> > +  required:
> > +    - compatible
> > +
> > +allOf:
> > +  - $ref: /schemas/arm/primecell.yaml#
> > +
> > +properties:
> > +  compatible:
> > +    items:
> > +      - const: arm,coresight-dynamic-funnel
> > +      - const: arm,primecell
> > +
> > +  reg:
> > +    maxItems: 1
> > +
> > +  clocks:
> > +    minItems: 1
> > +    maxItems: 2
> > +
> > +  clock-names:
> > +    minItems: 1
> > +    items:
> > +      - const: apb_pclk
> > +      - const: atclk
> > +
> > +  in-ports:
> > +    $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/properties/ports
> 
> Shouldn't this be with unevaluatedProperties:false?

No, because the ports definition has 'additionalProperties: false'. That 
does mean port nodes aren't actually restricted to 0-7 in any way. Not 
really any way to fix that other than listing #address-cells/#size-cells 
here or a pattern matching disallowed ports. But I think the limit to 8 
is just current implementations and perhaps practical limit of how many 
streams of trace data can be combined.

> > +
> > +    patternProperties:
> > +      '^port(@[0-7])?$':
> > +        description: Input connections from CoreSight Trace bus
> > +        $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/properties/port

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ