linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] selftests: memcg: Fix compilation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220523132917.GA4988@blackbody.suse.cz>
Date:   Mon, 23 May 2022 15:29:17 +0200
From:   Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>
To:     Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>
Cc:     cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
        Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        Richard Palethorpe <rpalethorpe@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] selftests: memcg: Fix compilation

On Sat, May 21, 2022 at 07:11:01PM +0500, Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com> wrote:
> On 5/18/22 9:18 PM, Michal Koutný wrote:
> > This fixes mis-applied changes from commit 72b1e03aa725 ("cgroup:
> > account for memory_localevents in test_memcg_oom_group_leaf_events()").
> Shouldn't the Fixes tag be added here and in 2/5 patch?

Ad the patch 1/5 -- yes, sounds appropriate.

Ad the patch 2/5 -- that's an effective revert, I don't see reverts
being marked with Fixes.

I see the patch 5/5 didn't make it to MLs (their public archives, except
for LKML). So I'll resend the series with the modified commit message
(if nothing else pops up).

Michal