[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220523132728.lfk6mskynqk636m4@bogus>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2022 14:27:28 +0100
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To: cgel.zte@...il.com
Cc: cristian.marussi@....com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@....com.cn>,
Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: arm_scmi: Avoid leak OF node on error
On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 11:11:16AM +0000, cgel.zte@...il.com wrote:
> From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@....com.cn>
>
> The OF node should be put before returning error in smc_chan_available(),
> otherwise node's refcount will be leaked.
>
> Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
> Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@....com.cn>
> ---
> drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/smc.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/smc.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/smc.c
> index 745acfdd0b3d..43018be70edc 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/smc.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/smc.c
> @@ -55,10 +55,10 @@ static irqreturn_t smc_msg_done_isr(int irq, void *data)
> static bool smc_chan_available(struct device *dev, int idx)
> {
> struct device_node *np = of_parse_phandle(dev->of_node, "shmem", 0);
> + of_node_put(np);
While this may work as of_node_put handles NULL as argument, what is the
point of unnecessary of_node_put(NULL) here ?
--
Regards,
Sudeep
Powered by blists - more mailing lists