[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220524181918.dadrny7gle7zfcdk@SoMainline.org>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 20:19:18 +0200
From: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ys.net>,
Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] leds: Add driver for Qualcomm LPG
On 2022-05-24 00:18:35, Pavel Machek wrote:
[...]
> > > I'd really like to see the patch fixing the pattern interface (or
> > > disabling it). I don't want to push the tree to Linus with that bug.
> >
> > (I couldn't help but be confused for a minute by this being a reply to
> > the original v1 patchset from March 2017 :) )
> >
> > Does that mean there's still some time to review / pick up [1]
> > (LPG enablement for PM660L)? And even more so for [2] (fixing the use
> > of a software-pattern variable in the hardware-pattern code) which
> > complements Bjorn's series but hasn't been looked at ever since last
> > year.
>
> There's still time if the patches are perfect.
How should I know if a patch is perfect when it has been ignored for
over a year [1]? Only Bjorn has reviewed and tested it.
I'm not asking for an instant merge, but feedback is appreciated. I
don't see any glaring issues with the patch so I'm kindly (re-)asking
you to point them out so that I can correct the patch.
- Marijn
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-leds/20210418213427.220638-1-marijn.suijten@somainline.org/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists