[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220524185324.28395-3-bp@alien8.de>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 20:53:23 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 2/3] x86/microcode: Default-disable late loading
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
It is dangerous and it should not be used anyway - there's a nice early
loading already.
Requested-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
---
arch/x86/Kconfig | 11 +++++++++++
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c | 2 ++
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c | 7 ++++++-
3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
index 1c0da2dbfb26..33891b82fb65 100644
--- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
@@ -1345,6 +1345,17 @@ config MICROCODE_AMD
If you select this option, microcode patch loading support for AMD
processors will be enabled.
+config MICROCODE_LATE_LOADING
+ bool "Late microcode loading (DANGEROUS)"
+ default n
+ depends on MICROCODE
+ help
+ Loading microcode late, when the system is up and executing instructions
+ is a tricky business and should be avoided if possible. Just the sequence
+ of synchronizing all cores and SMT threads is one fragile dance which does
+ not guarantee that cores might not softlock after the loading. Therefore,
+ use this at your own risk. Late loading taints the kernel too.
+
config X86_MSR
tristate "/dev/cpu/*/msr - Model-specific register support"
help
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
index 2e9142797c99..c296cb1c0113 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
@@ -2222,6 +2222,7 @@ void cpu_init_secondary(void)
}
#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_MICROCODE_LATE_LOADING
/*
* The microcode loader calls this upon late microcode load to recheck features,
* only when microcode has been updated. Caller holds microcode_mutex and CPU
@@ -2251,6 +2252,7 @@ void microcode_check(void)
pr_warn("x86/CPU: CPU features have changed after loading microcode, but might not take effect.\n");
pr_warn("x86/CPU: Please consider either early loading through initrd/built-in or a potential BIOS update.\n");
}
+#endif
/*
* Invoked from core CPU hotplug code after hotplug operations
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c
index b72c4134f289..c717db6b6856 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c
@@ -376,6 +376,7 @@ static int apply_microcode_on_target(int cpu)
/* fake device for request_firmware */
static struct platform_device *microcode_pdev;
+#ifdef CONFIG_MICROCODE_LATE_LOADING
/*
* Late loading dance. Why the heavy-handed stomp_machine effort?
*
@@ -543,6 +544,9 @@ static ssize_t reload_store(struct device *dev,
return ret;
}
+static DEVICE_ATTR_WO(reload);
+#endif
+
static ssize_t version_show(struct device *dev,
struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
{
@@ -559,7 +563,6 @@ static ssize_t pf_show(struct device *dev,
return sprintf(buf, "0x%x\n", uci->cpu_sig.pf);
}
-static DEVICE_ATTR_WO(reload);
static DEVICE_ATTR(version, 0444, version_show, NULL);
static DEVICE_ATTR(processor_flags, 0444, pf_show, NULL);
@@ -712,7 +715,9 @@ static int mc_cpu_down_prep(unsigned int cpu)
}
static struct attribute *cpu_root_microcode_attrs[] = {
+#ifdef CONFIG_MICROCODE_LATE_LOADING
&dev_attr_reload.attr,
+#endif
NULL
};
--
2.35.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists