[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c6ae7eda-0792-2ac0-e524-eb000366b50f@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 11:15:44 +0800
From: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
CC: <linux@...linux.org.uk>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <robh@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] amba: fix refcount underflow if amba_device_add() fails
On 2022/5/24 11:09, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 10:51:39AM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
>> "ARM: 9192/1: amba: fix memory leak in amba_device_try_add()" leads
>> to a refcount underflow if amba_device_add() fails, which called by
>> of_amba_device_create(), the of_amba_device_create() already exists
>> the error handling, so amba_put_device() only need to be added into
>> amba_deferred_retry().
>>
>> Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
>> Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
> Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Thanks.
PS: I also test with kmemleak, this could also fix previous memory leak
issue.
>
> Thanks,
> Guenter
>
>> ---
>> drivers/amba/bus.c | 8 ++------
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/amba/bus.c b/drivers/amba/bus.c
>> index 0e3ed5eb367b..0cb20324da16 100644
>> --- a/drivers/amba/bus.c
>> +++ b/drivers/amba/bus.c
>> @@ -493,13 +493,8 @@ static int amba_device_try_add(struct amba_device *dev, struct resource *parent)
>> goto skip_probe;
>>
>> ret = amba_read_periphid(dev);
>> - if (ret) {
>> - if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER) {
>> - amba_device_put(dev);
>> - goto err_out;
>> - }
>> + if (ret)
>> goto err_release;
>> - }
>>
>> skip_probe:
>> ret = device_add(&dev->dev);
>> @@ -546,6 +541,7 @@ static int amba_deferred_retry(void)
>> continue;
>>
>> list_del_init(&ddev->node);
>> + amba_device_put(ddev->dev);
>> kfree(ddev);
>> }
>>
>> --
>> 2.35.3
>>
> .
Powered by blists - more mailing lists