linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 2/7] block: allow blk-zoned devices to have non-power-of-2 zone size

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <83ef402e-1cff-a675-eab6-9fac9bb7565d@suse.de>
Date:   Tue, 24 May 2022 09:14:11 +0200
From:   Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
To:     Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@...sung.com>, axboe@...nel.dk, hch@....de,
        snitzer@...hat.com, damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com,
        Johannes.Thumshirn@....com
Cc:     linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, dm-devel@...hat.com,
        dsterba@...e.com, jiangbo.365@...edance.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gost.dev@...sung.com,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org, jaegeuk@...nel.org,
        Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/7] block: allow blk-zoned devices to have
 non-power-of-2 zone size

On 5/24/22 09:10, Pankaj Raghav wrote:
> On 5/24/22 07:19, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> 
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h
>>> index c4e4c7071b7b..f5c7a41032ba 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
>>> @@ -676,6 +676,21 @@ static inline unsigned int
>>> blk_queue_zone_no(struct request_queue *q,
>>>        return div64_u64(sector, zone_sectors);
>>>    }
>>>    +static inline bool blk_queue_is_zone_start(struct request_queue *q,
>>> sector_t sec)
>>> +{
>>> +    sector_t zone_sectors = blk_queue_zone_sectors(q);
>>> +    u64 remainder = 0;
>>> +
>>> +    if (!blk_queue_is_zoned(q))
>>> +        return false;
>>> +
>>
>> Not sure if we need this here; surely blk_queue_zone_sectors() will
>> already barf, and none of the callers did this check.
>>
> I totally agree with you but all the other blk_queue_* functions had
> this defensive check and I didn't want to break that pattern:
> 
Ah, fair enough.

Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke                Kernel Storage Architect
hare@...e.de                              +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), Geschäftsführer: Ivo Totev, Andrew
Myers, Andrew McDonald, Martje Boudien Moerman