linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] netfs: Fix gcc-12 warning by embedding vfs inode in netfs_i

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9945711f-c786-2300-9854-ee7734024a2c@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue, 24 May 2022 17:50:54 +0800
From:   Xiubo Li <xiubli@...hat.com>
To:     Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc:     keescook@...omium.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@...il.com>,
        Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@...kov.net>,
        Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>,
        Christian Schoenebeck <linux_oss@...debyte.com>,
        Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@...istor.com>,
        Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>,
        Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>,
        William Kucharski <william.kucharski@...cle.com>,
        "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org, ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org, samba-technical@...ts.samba.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] netfs: Fix gcc-12 warning by embedding vfs inode in
 netfs_i_context


On 5/23/22 7:05 PM, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Mon, 2022-05-23 at 11:46 +0100, David Howells wrote:
>> Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Note that there are some conflicts between this patch and some of the
>>> patches in the current ceph-client/testing branch. Depending on the
>>> order of merge, one or the other will need to be fixed.
>> Do you think it could be taken through the ceph tree?
>>
>> David
>>
> Since this touches a lot of non-ceph code, it may be best to just plan
> to merge it ASAP, and we'll just base our merge branch on top of it.
>
> Ilya/Xiubo, do you have an opinion here?
>   

Yeah, agree with Jeff.