[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yoy3wDh0cvziWGHJ@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 12:47:28 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
To: hezhongkun <hezhongkun.hzk@...edance.com>
Cc: hannes@...xchg.org, roman.gushchin@...ux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, lizefan.x@...edance.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: memcontrol: add the mempolicy interface for cgroup
v2.
On Tue 24-05-22 18:36:38, hezhongkun wrote:
> From: Hezhongkun <hezhongkun.hzk@...edance.com>
>
> Mempolicy is difficult to use because it is set in-process
> via a system call. We want to make it easier to use mempolicy
> in cgroups, so that we can control low-priority cgroups to
> allocate memory in specified nodes. So this patch want to
> adds the mempolicy interface.
>
> the mempolicy priority of memcgroup is higher than the priority
> of task. The order of getting the policy is,
> memcgroup->policy,task->policy or vma policy, default policy.
> memcgroup's policy is owned by itself, so descendants will
> not inherit it.
Why cannot you use cpuset cgroup?
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists