[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6a549193-909b-6f6e-532b-99cd2898ad80@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 09:07:49 +0800
From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
To: Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>
CC: <axboe@...nel.dk>, <ming.lei@...hat.com>,
<linux-block@...r.kernel.org>, <nbd@...er.debian.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <yi.zhang@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v3 3/6] nbd: don't clear 'NBD_CMD_INFLIGHT' flag if
request is not completed
在 2022/05/23 22:12, Josef Bacik 写道:
> On Sat, May 21, 2022 at 03:37:46PM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote:
>> Otherwise io will hung because request will only be completed if the
>> cmd has the flag 'NBD_CMD_INFLIGHT'.
>>
>> Fixes: 07175cb1baf4 ("nbd: make sure request completion won't concurrent")
>> Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/block/nbd.c | 18 ++++++++++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/block/nbd.c b/drivers/block/nbd.c
>> index 2ee1e376d5c4..a0d0910dae2a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/block/nbd.c
>> +++ b/drivers/block/nbd.c
>> @@ -403,13 +403,14 @@ static enum blk_eh_timer_return nbd_xmit_timeout(struct request *req,
>> if (!mutex_trylock(&cmd->lock))
>> return BLK_EH_RESET_TIMER;
>>
>> - if (!__test_and_clear_bit(NBD_CMD_INFLIGHT, &cmd->flags)) {
>> + if (!test_bit(NBD_CMD_INFLIGHT, &cmd->flags)) {
>> mutex_unlock(&cmd->lock);
>> return BLK_EH_DONE;
>> }
>>
>> if (!refcount_inc_not_zero(&nbd->config_refs)) {
>> cmd->status = BLK_STS_TIMEOUT;
>> + __clear_bit(NBD_CMD_INFLIGHT, &cmd->flags);
>> mutex_unlock(&cmd->lock);
>> goto done;
>> }
>> @@ -478,6 +479,7 @@ static enum blk_eh_timer_return nbd_xmit_timeout(struct request *req,
>> dev_err_ratelimited(nbd_to_dev(nbd), "Connection timed out\n");
>> set_bit(NBD_RT_TIMEDOUT, &config->runtime_flags);
>> cmd->status = BLK_STS_IOERR;
>> + __clear_bit(NBD_CMD_INFLIGHT, &cmd->flags);
>> mutex_unlock(&cmd->lock);
>> sock_shutdown(nbd);
>> nbd_config_put(nbd);
>> @@ -745,7 +747,7 @@ static struct nbd_cmd *nbd_handle_reply(struct nbd_device *nbd, int index,
>> cmd = blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(req);
>>
>> mutex_lock(&cmd->lock);
>> - if (!__test_and_clear_bit(NBD_CMD_INFLIGHT, &cmd->flags)) {
>> + if (!test_bit(NBD_CMD_INFLIGHT, &cmd->flags)) {
>> dev_err(disk_to_dev(nbd->disk), "Suspicious reply %d (status %u flags %lu)",
>> tag, cmd->status, cmd->flags);
>> ret = -ENOENT;
>> @@ -854,8 +856,16 @@ static void recv_work(struct work_struct *work)
>> }
>>
>> rq = blk_mq_rq_from_pdu(cmd);
>> - if (likely(!blk_should_fake_timeout(rq->q)))
>> - blk_mq_complete_request(rq);
>> + if (likely(!blk_should_fake_timeout(rq->q))) {
>> + bool complete;
>> +
>> + mutex_lock(&cmd->lock);
>> + complete = __test_and_clear_bit(NBD_CMD_INFLIGHT,
>> + &cmd->flags);
>> + mutex_unlock(&cmd->lock);
>> + if (complete)
>> + blk_mq_complete_request(rq);
>> + }
>
> I'd rather this be handled in nbd_handle_reply. We should return with it
> cleared if it's ready to be completed. Thanks,
Hi,
Thanks for your advice, I'll do that in next version. I'll still have to
hold the lock to set the bit again in case blk_should_fake_timeout()
pass...
Thanks,
Kuai
>
> Josef
> .
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists