[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220524135034.GU1343366@nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 10:50:34 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.com>,
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, vkoul@...nel.org,
robin.murphy@....com, will@...nel.org, Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
"Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
Raj Ashok <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] iommu: Add a per domain PASID for DMA API
On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 11:21:15AM -0700, Jacob Pan wrote:
> DMA requests tagged with PASID can target individual IOMMU domains.
> Introduce a domain-wide PASID for DMA API, it will be used on the same
> mapping as legacy DMA without PASID. Let it be IOVA or PA in case of
> identity domain.
Huh? I can't understand what this is trying to say or why this patch
makes sense.
We really should not have pasid's like this attached to the domains..
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists