linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] MIPS: Modify early_parse

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 24 May 2022 10:01:28 +0800
From:   Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>
To:     Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
Cc:     Xuefeng Li <lixuefeng@...ngson.cn>, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] MIPS: Modify early_parse_mem()



On 05/23/2022 09:28 PM, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote:
> On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 03:30:11PM +0800, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 03/18/2022 11:05 PM, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
>>> Tiezhu Yang (3):
>>>   MIPS: Return -EINVAL if mem parameter is empty in early_parse_mem()
>>>   MIPS: Return -EINVAL if mem parameter is invalid in early_parse_mem()
>>>   MIPS: Use memblock_add_node() in early_parse_mem() under CONFIG_NUMA
>>>
>>>  arch/mips/kernel/setup.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>>>  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>
>>
>> Hi Thomas,
>>
>> Any comments? Are you OK with these changes?
>
> first and last patch are ok with me. The second patch changes semantics
> for mem=, which I don't want to change. Iirc the latest idea to solve
> your problem was to use mem=XX@ syntax to limit detected memory, which
> is the preferred way for me, too.
>
> If you want I'll take patch 1 and 3 out of this series.
>
> Thomas.
>

OK, thank you.

Let me rebase and send v2 later.

Thanks,
Tiezhu