[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yoz16RUZvfyxmywT@xhacker>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 23:12:41 +0800
From: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>
To: Liao Chang <liaochang1@...wei.com>, Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>
Cc: paul.walmsley@...ive.com, palmer@...belt.com,
aou@...s.berkeley.edu, mhiramat@...nel.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
peterz@...radead.org, naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv/kprobe: reclaim insn_slot on kprobe unregistration
On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 09:51:24AM +0800, Liao Chang wrote:
> On kprobe registration kernel allocate one insn_slot for new kprobe,
> but it forget to reclaim the insn_slot on unregistration, leading to a
> potential leakage.
+ Guo Ren
Nice catch! I think csky needs the fix as well.
>
> This bug reported by Chen Guokai <chenguokai17@...ls.ucas.ac.cn>.
This needs a "Reported-by: ..." tag
>
> Signed-off-by: Liao Chang <liaochang1@...wei.com>
> ---
> arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
> index e6e950b7cf32..f12eb1fbb52c 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
> @@ -110,6 +110,10 @@ void __kprobes arch_disarm_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
>
> void __kprobes arch_remove_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
> {
> + if (p->ainsn.api.insn) {
> + free_insn_slot(p->ainsn.api.insn, 0);
> + p->ainsn.api.insn = NULL;
> + }
> }
>
> static void __kprobes save_previous_kprobe(struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb)
> --
> 2.17.1
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
Powered by blists - more mailing lists