linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] ARM: mm: kill unused runtime hook arch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c89a11b3-99e6-edbe-ae23-36038b7e3a07@huawei.com>
Date:   Tue, 24 May 2022 10:03:09 +0800
From:   Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
To:     Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
CC:     <will@...nel.org>, <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        <hch@...radead.org>, <arnd@...db.de>, <anshuman.khandual@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] ARM: mm: kill unused runtime hook arch_iounmap()


On 2022/5/20 23:28, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> Hi Russell,
>
> On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 04:25:47PM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
>> Since the following commits,
>>
>> v5.4
>>    commit 59d3ae9a5bf6 ("ARM: remove Intel iop33x and iop13xx support")
>> v5.11
>>    commit 3e3f354bc383 ("ARM: remove ebsa110 platform")
>>
>> The runtime hook arch_iounmap() on ARM is useless, kill arch_iounmap()
>> and __iounmap(), and the naming of arch_iounmap will be used in
>> GENERIC_IOREMAP with the later patch.
>>
>> Cc: Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
>> Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
> Probably too late for this merging window but are you ok for this patch
> to go in via the arm64 tree (together with the rest of the series)?
>
> Alternatively it could go into your patch system and hopefully land in
> 5.19 so that we can take the rest for 5.20.
Russell, should I send it to patch system or let Catalin take it?
>
> Thanks.
>