[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c22de8df-0599-0a86-146a-267f576f5500@deltatee.com>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 09:55:51 -0600
From: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
To: Donald Buczek <buczek@...gen.mpg.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@...ux.dev>,
Xiao Ni <xni@...hat.com>, Stephen Bates <sbates@...thlin.com>,
Martin Oliveira <Martin.Oliveira@...eticom.com>,
David Sloan <David.Sloan@...eticom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 12/15] md/raid5-cache: Add RCU protection to conf->log
accesses
On 2022-05-22 01:32, Donald Buczek wrote:
>> /*
>> @@ -703,7 +720,7 @@ static void r5c_disable_writeback_async(struct work_struct *work)
>>
>> /* wait superblock change before suspend */
>> wait_event(mddev->sb_wait,
>> - conf->log == NULL ||
>> + rcu_access_pointer(conf->log) ||
>
> Reversed condition?
>
> I think, some examples in Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.rst are reversed, too.
Oops. Nice Catch!
Thanks,
Logan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists