linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V5 0/9] rework on the IRQ hardening of virtio

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 24 May 2022 18:27:51 +0200
From:   Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Cc:     mst@...hat.com, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
        peterz@...radead.org, paulmck@...nel.org, maz@...nel.org,
        cohuck@...hat.com, eperezma@...hat.com, lulu@...hat.com,
        sgarzare@...hat.com, xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com,
        Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 0/9] rework on the IRQ hardening of virtio

On Mon, 23 May 2022 10:53:23 +0200
Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 18 May 2022 11:59:42 +0800
> Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi All:  
> 
> Sorry for being slow on this one. I'm pretty much under water. Will try
> to get some regression-testing done till tomorrow end of day.
> 

Did some testing with the two stage indicators disabled. Didn't see any
significant difference in performance, and with that also no performance
regression. IMHO we are good to go ahead!

Sorry it took so long.

Regards,
Halil