linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 15/25] scripts: checkpatch: diagnose uses of `%pA` in the C side

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 24 May 2022 18:35:58 +0200
From:   Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:     Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        rust-for-linux <rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
        Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...gle.com>,
        Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
        Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@...il.com>,
        Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 15/25] scripts: checkpatch: diagnose uses of `%pA` in
 the C side

On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 4:17 AM Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
>
> How many developers are required for a trivial patch?

We are sending the core series as a team, so by default I acknowledge
all the maintainers. But yeah, I could drop some of the
Co-developed-by's.

> and this should now use elsif

Yeah, will change.

By the way, I also thought about skipping the warning if the error is
there, e.g. wrapping everything else in an `else`, if you prefer.

Thanks for the very quick review!

Cheers,
Miguel