linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] dt-bindings: remoteproc: qcom: Convert SC7180 MSS bindings to YAML

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9badcfce-1db2-5381-bab8-8e52b875cebd@linaro.org>
Date:   Tue, 24 May 2022 19:33:41 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@...cinc.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
        ohad@...ery.com, agross@...nel.org, mathieu.poirier@...aro.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        swboyd@...omium.org, mka@...omium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] dt-bindings: remoteproc: qcom: Convert SC7180 MSS
 bindings to YAML

On 24/05/2022 04:00, Sibi Sankar wrote:
> Hey Rob/Krzysztof,
> 
> On 5/21/22 8:04 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 21/05/2022 00:40, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 10:17:05PM +0530, Sibi Sankar wrote:
>>>> Convert SC7180 MSS PIL loading bindings to YAML.
>>>
>>> I suppose there is a reason the sc7180 is being split out and the only
>>> one converted, but this doesn't tell me.
>>
>> I am also confused, especially that last time I pointed out that there
>> is work already:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220511161602.117772-7-sireeshkodali1@gmail.com/
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/e3543961-1645-b02a-c869-f8fa1ad2d41c@quicinc.com/#t
> 
> The reason for the split was discussed on the list ^^, thought it
> wouldn't make much sense adding any of it to the commit message.
> Also since Krzysztof said he wanted a alignment between Sireesh/me
> we did exchange mails saying I'll take care of SC7180/SC7280 (since
> they had pas compatible which is overridden by mss compatible) and
> he could continue with the rest.


Sounds good to me, but Rob's got a point - this background should be
better explained.


Best regards,
Krzysztof