linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] mm/shmem: fix infinite loop when swap in shmem error at swapoff time

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 25 May 2022 04:32:44 +0000
From:   HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口　直也) 
        <naoya.horiguchi@....com>
To:     Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
CC:     "akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "hughd@...gle.com" <hughd@...gle.com>,
        "willy@...radead.org" <willy@...radead.org>,
        "vbabka@...e.cz" <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        "dhowells@...hat.com" <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        "neilb@...e.de" <neilb@...e.de>,
        "apopple@...dia.com" <apopple@...dia.com>,
        "david@...hat.com" <david@...hat.com>,
        "surenb@...gle.com" <surenb@...gle.com>,
        "peterx@...hat.com" <peterx@...hat.com>,
        "rcampbell@...dia.com" <rcampbell@...dia.com>,
        "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] mm/shmem: fix infinite loop when swap in shmem
 error at swapoff time

On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 08:50:29PM +0800, Miaohe Lin wrote:
> When swap in shmem error at swapoff time, there would be a infinite loop
> in the while loop in shmem_unuse_inode(). It's because swapin error is
> deliberately ignored now and thus info->swapped will never reach 0. So
> we can't escape the loop in shmem_unuse().
> 
> In order to fix the issue, swapin_error entry is stored in the mapping
> when swapin error occurs. So the swapcache page can be freed and the
> user won't end up with a permanently mounted swap because a sector is
> bad. If the page is accessed later, the user process will be killed
> so that corrupted data is never consumed. On the other hand, if the
> page is never accessed, the user won't even notice it.
> 
> Reported-by: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
> ---

...
> @@ -1672,6 +1676,36 @@ static int shmem_replace_page(struct page **pagep, gfp_t gfp,
>  	return error;
>  }
>  
> +static void shmem_set_folio_swapin_error(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t index,
> +					 struct folio *folio, swp_entry_t swap)
> +{
> +	struct address_space *mapping = inode->i_mapping;
> +	struct shmem_inode_info *info = SHMEM_I(inode);
> +	swp_entry_t swapin_error;
> +	void *old;
> +
> +	swapin_error = make_swapin_error_entry(&folio->page);
> +	old = xa_cmpxchg_irq(&mapping->i_pages, index,
> +			     swp_to_radix_entry(swap),
> +			     swp_to_radix_entry(swapin_error), 0);
> +	if (old != swp_to_radix_entry(swap))
> +		return;
> +
> +	folio_wait_writeback(folio);
> +	delete_from_swap_cache(&folio->page);
> +	spin_lock_irq(&info->lock);
> +	/*
> +	 * Don't treat swapin error folio as alloced. Otherwise inode->i_blocks won't
> +	 * be 0 when inode is released and thus trigger WARN_ON(inode->i_blocks) in
> +	 * shmem_evict_inode.
> +	 */
> +	info->alloced--;
> +	info->swapped--;

I'm not familiar with folio yet and might miss some basic thing,
but is it OK to decrement by one instead of folio_nr_pages()?

Thanks,
Naoya Horiguchi