linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] x86: Handle idle=nomwait cmdline properly for x86

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 25 May 2022 16:06:24 +0800
From:   Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
To:     Wyes Karny <wyes.karny@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Lewis.Carroll@....com, Mario.Limonciello@....com,
        gautham.shenoy@....com, Ananth.Narayan@....com, bharata@....com,
        len.brown@...el.com, x86@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
        mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
        hpa@...or.com, peterz@...radead.org, chang.seok.bae@...el.com,
        keescook@...omium.org, metze@...ba.org, zhengqi.arch@...edance.com,
        mark.rutland@....com, puwen@...on.cn, rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com,
        andrew.cooper3@...rix.com, jing2.liu@...el.com,
        jmattson@...gle.com, pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] x86: Handle idle=nomwait cmdline properly for
 x86_idle

On Mon, 2022-05-23 at 22:25 +0530, Wyes Karny wrote:
> When kernel is booted with idle=nomwait do not use MWAIT as the
> default idle state.
> 
> If the user boots the kernel with idle=nomwait, it is a clear
> direction to not use mwait as the default idle state.
> However, the current code does not take this into consideration
> while selecting the default idle state on x86.
> 
> This patch fixes it by checking for the idle=nomwait boot option in
> prefer_mwait_c1_over_halt().
> 
> Also update the documentation around idle=nomwait appropriately.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wyes Karny <wyes.karny@....com>
> ---
> Changes in v4:
> - Update documentation around idle=nomwait
> - Rename patch subject
> 
>  Documentation/admin-guide/pm/cpuidle.rst | 15 +++++++++------
>  arch/x86/kernel/process.c                |  6 +++++-
>  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/pm/cpuidle.rst
> b/Documentation/admin-guide/pm/cpuidle.rst
> index aec2cd2aaea7..19754beb5a4e 100644
> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/pm/cpuidle.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/pm/cpuidle.rst
> @@ -612,8 +612,8 @@ the ``menu`` governor to be used on the systems
> that use the ``ladder`` governor
>  by default this way, for example.
>  
>  The other kernel command line parameters controlling CPU idle time
> management
> -described below are only relevant for the *x86* architecture and
> some of
> -them affect Intel processors only.
> +described below are only relevant for the *x86* architecture and
> references
> +to ``intel_idle`` affect Intel processors only.
>  
>  The *x86* architecture support code recognizes three kernel command
> line
>  options related to CPU idle time management: ``idle=poll``,
> ``idle=halt``,
> @@ -635,10 +635,13 @@ idle, so it very well may hurt single-thread
> computations performance as well as
>  energy-efficiency.  Thus using it for performance reasons may not be
> a good idea
>  at all.]
>  
> -The ``idle=nomwait`` option disables the ``intel_idle`` driver and
> causes
> -``acpi_idle`` to be used (as long as all of the information needed
> by it is
> -there in the system's ACPI tables), but it is not allowed to use the
> -``MWAIT`` instruction of the CPUs to ask the hardware to enter idle
> states.
> +The ``idle=nomwait`` option prevents the use of ``MWAIT``
> instruction of
> +the CPU to enter idle states. When this option is used, the
> ``acpi_idle``
> +driver will use the ``HLT`` instruction instead of ``MWAIT``. On
> systems
> +running Intel processors, this option disables the ``intel_idle``
> driver
> +and forces the use of the ``acpi_idle`` driver instead. Note that in
> either
> +case, ``acpi_idle`` driver will function only if all the information
> needed
> +by it is in the system's ACPI tables.
>  
>  In addition to the architecture-level kernel command line options
> affecting CPU
>  idle time management, there are parameters affecting individual
> ``CPUIdle``
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> index b370767f5b19..4e0178b066c5 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> @@ -824,6 +824,10 @@ static void amd_e400_idle(void)
>   */
>  static int prefer_mwait_c1_over_halt(const struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
>  {
> +	/* User has disallowed the use of MWAIT. Fallback to HALT */
> +	if (boot_option_idle_override == IDLE_NOMWAIT)
> +		return 0;
> +
>  	if (c->x86_vendor != X86_VENDOR_INTEL)
>  		return 0;
>  
> @@ -932,7 +936,7 @@ static int __init idle_setup(char *str)
>  	} else if (!strcmp(str, "nomwait")) {
>  		/*
>  		 * If the boot option of "idle=nomwait" is added,
> -		 * it means that mwait will be disabled for CPU C2/C3
> +		 * it means that mwait will be disabled for CPU
> C1/C2/C3
>  		 * states. In such case it won't touch the variable
>  		 * of boot_option_idle_override.

the code didn't change boot_option_idle_override when it was
introduced, but this has changed since commit d18960494f65 ("ACPI,
intel_idle: Cleanup idle= internal variables")

thanks,
rui