[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1962595.1653473587@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2022 11:13:07 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
cc: dhowells@...hat.com, willy@...radead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: checkpatch mistake on XA_STATE?
I see the following:
WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations
#1921: FILE: fs/cifs/smb2ops.c:4684:
+ struct folio *folio;
+ XA_STATE(xas, buffer, 0);
but XA_STATE() technically *is* a declaration.
Should checkpatch treat it as such?
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists