lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 25 May 2022 11:13:07 +0100
From:   David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:     Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
cc:     dhowells@...hat.com, willy@...radead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: checkpatch mistake on XA_STATE?

I see the following:

	WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations
	#1921: FILE: fs/cifs/smb2ops.c:4684:
	+       struct folio *folio;
	+       XA_STATE(xas, buffer, 0);

but XA_STATE() technically *is* a declaration.

Should checkpatch treat it as such?

David

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ