[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGsJ_4wSmZo9+Anzq_WjF=xACRT7p0EJ86de6C=8xhGpTBOHQg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2022 23:10:41 +1200
From: Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LAK <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
hanchuanhua <hanchuanhua@...o.com>,
张诗明(Simon Zhang)
<zhangshiming@...o.com>, 郭健 <guojian@...o.com>,
Barry Song <v-songbaohua@...o.com>,
"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, Shaohua Li <shli@...nel.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Steven Price <steven.price@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: enable THP_SWAP for arm64
On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 7:14 AM Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 10:05:35PM +1200, Barry Song wrote:
> > On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 8:12 PM Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com> wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 07:14:03PM +1200, Barry Song wrote:
> > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> > > > index d550f5acfaf3..8e3771c56fbf 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> > > > @@ -98,6 +98,7 @@ config ARM64
> > > > select ARCH_WANT_HUGE_PMD_SHARE if ARM64_4K_PAGES || (ARM64_16K_PAGES && !ARM64_VA_BITS_36)
> > > > select ARCH_WANT_LD_ORPHAN_WARN
> > > > select ARCH_WANTS_NO_INSTR
> > > > + select ARCH_WANTS_THP_SWAP if ARM64_4K_PAGES
> > >
> > > I'm not opposed to this but I think it would break pages mapped with
> > > PROT_MTE. We have an assumption in mte_sync_tags() that compound pages
> > > are not swapped out (or in). With MTE, we store the tags in a slab
> >
> > I assume you mean mte_sync_tags() require that THP is not swapped as a whole,
> > as without THP_SWP, THP is still swapping after being splitted. MTE doesn't stop
> > THP from swapping through a couple of splitted pages, does it?
>
> That's correct, split THP page are swapped out/in just fine.
>
> > > object (128-bytes per swapped page) and restore them when pages are
> > > swapped in. At some point we may teach the core swap code about such
> > > metadata but in the meantime that was the easiest way.
> >
> > If my previous assumption is true, the easiest way to enable THP_SWP
> > for this moment might be always letting mm fallback to the splitting
> > way for MTE hardware. For this moment, I care about THP_SWP more as
> > none of my hardware has MTE.
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
> > index 45c358538f13..d55a2a3e41a9 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
> > @@ -44,6 +44,8 @@
> > __flush_tlb_range(vma, addr, end, PUD_SIZE, false, 1)
> > #endif /* CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE */
> >
> > +#define arch_thp_swp_supported !system_supports_mte
> > +
> > /*
> > * Outside of a few very special situations (e.g. hibernation), we always
> > * use broadcast TLB invalidation instructions, therefore a spurious page
> > diff --git a/include/linux/huge_mm.h b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
> > index 2999190adc22..064b6b03df9e 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/huge_mm.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
> > @@ -447,4 +447,16 @@ static inline int split_folio_to_list(struct folio *folio,
> > return split_huge_page_to_list(&folio->page, list);
> > }
> >
> > +/*
> > + * archs that select ARCH_WANTS_THP_SWAP but don't support THP_SWP due to
> > + * limitations in the implementation like arm64 MTE can override this to
> > + * false
> > + */
> > +#ifndef arch_thp_swp_supported
> > +static inline bool arch_thp_swp_supported(void)
> > +{
> > + return true;
> > +}
> > +#endif
> > +
> > #endif /* _LINUX_HUGE_MM_H */
> > diff --git a/mm/swap_slots.c b/mm/swap_slots.c
> > index 2b5531840583..dde685836328 100644
> > --- a/mm/swap_slots.c
> > +++ b/mm/swap_slots.c
> > @@ -309,7 +309,7 @@ swp_entry_t get_swap_page(struct page *page)
> > entry.val = 0;
> >
> > if (PageTransHuge(page)) {
> > - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_THP_SWAP))
> > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_THP_SWAP) && arch_thp_swp_supported())
> > get_swap_pages(1, &entry, HPAGE_PMD_NR);
> > goto out;
>
> I think this should work and with your other proposal it would be
> limited to MTE pages:
>
> #define arch_thp_swp_supported(page) (!test_bit(PG_mte_tagged, &page->flags))
>
> Are THP pages loaded from swap as a whole or are they split? IIRC the
i can confirm thp is written as a whole through:
[ 90.622863] __swap_writepage+0xe8/0x580
[ 90.622881] swap_writepage+0x44/0xf8
[ 90.622891] pageout+0xe0/0x2a8
[ 90.622906] shrink_page_list+0x9dc/0xde0
[ 90.622917] shrink_inactive_list+0x1ec/0x3c8
[ 90.622928] shrink_lruvec+0x3dc/0x628
[ 90.622939] shrink_node+0x37c/0x6a0
[ 90.622950] balance_pgdat+0x354/0x668
[ 90.622961] kswapd+0x1e0/0x3c0
[ 90.622972] kthread+0x110/0x120
but i have never got a backtrace in which thp is loaded as a whole though it
seems the code has this path:
int swap_readpage(struct page *page, bool synchronous)
{
...
bio = bio_alloc(sis->bdev, 1, REQ_OP_READ, GFP_KERNEL);
bio->bi_iter.bi_sector = swap_page_sector(page);
bio->bi_end_io = end_swap_bio_read;
bio_add_page(bio, page, thp_size(page), 0);
...
submit_bio(bio);
}
> splitting still happens but after the swapping out finishes. Even if
> they are loaded as 4K pages, we still have the mte_save_tags() that only
> understands small pages currently, so rejecting THP pages is probably
> best.
as anyway i don't have a mte-hardware to do a valid test to go any
further, so i will totally disable thp_swp for hardware having mte for
this moment in patch v2.
>
> --
> Catalin
Thanks
Barry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists